Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marshall Family Philanthropic Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$893kReligion$307kPhilanthropy$295kCivil Rights$122kEducation$47kHuman Services$30kInternational$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$38,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$557k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 91% of reported assets are held in Western Alliance Bancorp.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crohn's & Colitis Foundation$125,000
Jewish Nevada$50,000
Congregation Ner Tamid$38,000
Project Legacy$25,000
Chabad of Southern Nevada$7,500
JDRF Breakthrough T1D$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Project Legacy: $25k → 9%Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation: $100k → 13%Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Marshall Family Philanthropic Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in NV; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Marshall Family Philanthropic Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
15

Total granted

$1.2M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-16%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc
    2× · 2018–2022 · $120k · revenue +24%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $119k · revenue +78%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $51k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Phoenix Pediatric Health Initiative Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +49%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
2
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
3
University of Judaism Foundation
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration

Promote and fund research into developing better diagnostic processes, therapies, and cures for frontotemporal degeneration (ftd); provide information, education, support and advocacy to persons diagnosed with ftd, their families and…

Health
6
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
The Jed Ian Taxel Foundation for Rare Cancer Research Inc

To inspire and empower scientific breakthroughs, clinical trials and improved treatments which change lives and enable better outcomes for rare cancer patients and their families.

Health
10
Jewish Life Foundation
11
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Community Center of Southern Nevada Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION NER TAMID — $274,905 · OtherCONGREGATION NER TAMIDCrohn's & Colitis Foundation — $250,000 · OtherCrohn's & Colitis FoundationCrohns's and Colitis Foundation — $200,000 · OtherCrohns's and Colitis FoundationJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER — $195,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTERThe Cleveland Clinic Foundation — $150,000 · OtherThe Cleveland Clinic FoundationCity of Phoenix Pediatric Health Initiative Fund — $50,000 · Other+12 more — $80,754 · Other+12 moreNathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc — $120,000 · Human ServicesNathan Ad…PROJECT LEGACY — $25,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT L…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $118,750 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION — $51,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $25,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA — $35,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $6,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $5,000 · International
Other$1,200,659Human Services$145,000Civil Rights$118,750Health$106,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$36,000International$11,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER — $195,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc — $120,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $118,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION — $51,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LEGACY — $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER
  • Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADA
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds PROJECT LEGACY
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lionel FoundationNV17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lionel Foundation · Alan and Christy Molasky Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Susan G Fine Family Foundation · Steinberg Family Foundation · Gloria and Mark Fine Family Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marshall Family Philanthropic Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marshall Family Philanthropic Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Marshall Family Philanthropic Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph