Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marlene and William O'Meara Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Human Services$293kCrime & Legal$42kHealth$22kInternational$10kReligion$7kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$2kArts & Culture$210Other$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $117k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLYMOUTH PLACE$117,437
CASA CORNELIA LAW CENTER$40,000
EFAA$18,192
WATTS OF LOVE$10,000
WELLNESS HOUSE$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LA RABIDA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$9,440
ST JOHN OF THE CROSS CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $276k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EFAA: $18k → 12%PLYMOUTH PLACE: $117k → 14%PLYMOUTH PLACE: $85k → 14%PLYMOUTH PLACE: $30k → 14%PLYMOUTH PLACE: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 80% of Marlene and William O'Meara Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 19% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Marlene and William O'Meara Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$318k · 15 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$318k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+233%

Still filing today

53%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalAnimalsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLYMOUTH PLACE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $258k · revenue +21%
  • CC
    Casa Cornelia Legal Services
    3× · 2020–2023 · $42k · revenue +60%
  • LC
    LORAS COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • LM
    LAGRANGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • AH
    AMITA HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SA
    ST ANGELA SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
2
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
5
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Le Moyne College

The College is a diverse learning community that strives for academic excellence in the Catholic and Jesuit tradition through comprehensive programs rooted in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
10
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
11
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
12
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Watts of Love. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLYMOUTH PLACE INC — $257,852 · Human ServicesPLYMOUTH PLACE INCEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $18,192 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONCasa Cornelia Legal Services — $42,000 · Crime & LegalCasa Corneli…Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago — $10,000 · OtherCatholic Ch…Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CHICAGO — $7,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CH…OUR CATHOLIC APPEAL LUMEN CORDIUM — $4,000 · OtherOUR CATHOLI…ST JOHN OF THE CROSS — $2,900 · OtherST JOHN OF …CATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMER — $2,000 · Other+12 more — $3,894 · Other+12 moreWellness House — $10,000 · HealthLa Rabida Children's Hospital — $9,440 · Health+2 more — $350 · HealthWATTS OF LOVE — $10,000 · InternationalClarke University of Dubuque Iowa — $400 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $210 · EducationChicago Zoological Society — $146 · AnimalsWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES — $25 · Religion
Human Services$276,044Crime & Legal$42,000Other$39,794Health$19,790International$10,000Education$610Animals$146Religion$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLYMOUTH PLACE INC — $257,852 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCasa Cornelia Legal Services — $42,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION — $18,192 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWATTS OF LOVE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellness House — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLa Rabida Children's Hospital — $9,440 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClarke University of Dubuque Iowa — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society — $146 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLYMOUTH PLACE INC
  • Who funds Casa Cornelia Legal Services
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WATTS OF LOVE
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago
  • Who funds Wellness House
  • Who funds La Rabida Children's Hospital
  • Who funds LORAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds Clarke University of Dubuque Iowa
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society
  • Who funds WORD ON FIRE CATHOLIC MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marlene and William O'Meara Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marlene and William O'Meara Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Marlene and William O'Meara Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph