Skip to content
Mark and Anita Pucci Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mark and Anita Pucci Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$169kHealth$147kRecreation & Sports$69kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kReligion$30kHuman Services$28kFood & Nutrition$19kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$479k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$40,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,125
ASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$10,000
CITY KIDS CAMP$6,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$2,000
SCHAUMBURG ON STAGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 → 14%CITY KIDS CAMP: $6k → 14%CITY KIDS CAMP: $4k → 14%CITY KIDS CAMP: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$470k · 15 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$470k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+78%

Still filing today

67%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +41%
  • AB
    ALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k · revenue +32%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • A
    ASCENSION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • AA
    ASCENSION ALEXIAN BROS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • AT
    AMERICAN TRANSPARENCY
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
2
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Disabilityin

The organization is the leading nonprofit resource for business disability inclusion worldwide. together with the world's leading brands, disability:in drives progress on disability inclusion through initiatives, tools, and expertise that…

Community Improvement
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Neller Pucci Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMITA HEALTH: $67,500 · OtherAMITA HEALTHASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherASCENSION ILLINOIS FOUNDATIONASCENSION: $20,000 · OtherASCENSIONASCENSION ALEXIAN BROS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherASCENSION ALEXIAN BROS FOUNDATIONST JULIAN CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+15 more: $34,807 · Other+15 moreOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $139,466 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL IN…Northwestern University: $64,300 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern …ALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM: $45,000 · HealthALEXIAN BRO…LUKE'S WINGS: $6,703 · HealthLUKE'S WING…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,500 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $37,125 · Human ServicesAmerican N…CITY KIDS CAMP: $13,000 · Human ServicesCITY KIDS …+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $19,104 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN TRANSPARENCY: $15,145 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education
Other$207,307International$139,466Recreation & Sports$64,300Health$54,203Human Services$50,375Food & Nutrition$19,104Education$18,145

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $139,466 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $64,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $37,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $19,104 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN TRANSPARENCY: $15,145 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITY KIDS CAMP: $13,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetLUKE'S WINGS: $6,703 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NELLER PUCCI FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPICKLEBERRY PIE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSCHAUMBURG ON STAGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $454 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mark and Anita Pucci Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mark and Anita Pucci Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mark and Anita Pucci Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home