Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mario P and Bianca C Borini Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$753kHealth$276kYouth Development$170kReligion$136kEnvironment$88kHuman Services$63kArts & Culture$23kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $285k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST POINT ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES$30,000
NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN$25,000
CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER$25,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS & SCIENCES$25,000
KIPS BAY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$20,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$10,000
MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LANGONE HOSPITAL AORTIC CENTER$10,000
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL$10,000
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH$10,000
HORACE MANN SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROJECT 150: $10k → 13%PROJECT 150: $10k → 13%PROJECT 150: $5k → 13%Project 150: $5k → 13%PROJECT 150: $5k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Mario P and Bianca C Borini Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Mario P and Bianca C Borini Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 31 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
22

Total granted

$1.2M
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+12%

Still filing today

45%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $155k · revenue +21%
  • KB
    Kips Bay Boys & Girls Club
    8× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +86%
  • NY
    NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • NY
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • FU
    Fordham University
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceIndependent K-8 SchoolsProfessional Ballet Compani…Community Health CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Development Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%10%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%64%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,726

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORDHAM LAW SCHOOL — $172,520 · OtherFORDHAM LAW SCHOOLHORACE MANN ANNUAL FUND — $76,250 · OtherHORACE MANN ANNUAL FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHORACE MANN SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND — $50,000 · OtherHORACE MANN SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDHARVARD COLLEGE FUND — $50,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE FUNDNEW YORK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL — $50,000 · OtherNEW YORK UNIVERSITY HOSPITALNEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL — $40,000 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CHURCH — $30,000 · OtherCAMP SOUSLEY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $30,000 · Other+34 more — $239,275 · Other+34 moreNew York University — $155,000 · EducationNew York UniversityPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $100,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL …+5 more — $24,750 · Education+5 moreKips Bay Boys & Girls Club — $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentKips Bay B…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $40,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $40,000 · HealthCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER — $25,000 · Health+2 more — $1,500 · HealthNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $85,000 · EnvironmentPROJECT 150 — $35,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $25,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $50,000 · Public Benefit
Other$808,045Education$309,750Youth Development$140,000Health$106,500Environment$85,000Human Services$60,000Public Benefit$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNew York University — $155,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKips Bay Boys & Girls Club — $140,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT 150 — $35,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIRO A SEGNO FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetFordham University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKJK PRODUCTIONS INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PIKE SCHOOL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN JESUIT PREP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR ITALIAN MODERN ART INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPhilabundance — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSALYN YALOW CHARTER SCHOOL — $4,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Valley Hospice Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAUE CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANCES PATRELLE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds Kips Bay Boys & Girls Club
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds PROJECT 150
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
  • Who funds CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER
  • Who funds TIRO A SEGNO FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Fordham University
  • Who funds KJK PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION
  • Who funds New York Historical Society
  • Who funds THE PIKE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds BROOKLYN JESUIT PREP
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ITALIAN MODERN ART INC
  • Who funds Philabundance

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mario P and Bianca C Borini Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph