Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margolis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$53kHealth$50kArts & Culture$49kFood & Nutrition$36kHuman Services$20kCrime & Legal$18kEnvironment$14kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC$6,000
FOOD EDUCATION FUND$5,000
REFUGE DREAM CENTER$2,000
THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$2,000
BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC$2,000
CURE DUCHENNE$2,000
VISITING NEIGHBORS INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%WILD FLOWER FOR KIDS: $50k → 8%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 10%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 7%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $2k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $2k → 17%OSBORNE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 28%BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $2k → 8%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $2k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 28%BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 8%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $2k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%OSBORNE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 28%BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 8%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $2k → 7%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC: $2k → 17%THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 28%BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 8%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $2k → 7%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 17%OSBORNE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 28%BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 8%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $2k → 7%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 17%OSBORNE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 28%BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 8%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $2k → 7%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 17%OSBORNE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 28%BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK: $2k → 8%CURE DUCHENNE: $2k → 10%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 17%OSBORNE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 28%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 17%NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 17%FOOD EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 17%FOOD EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 17%FOOD EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 17%FOOD EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216k · 14 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$216k
$51k

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +57%
  • FE
    FOOD EDUCATION FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +645%
  • VN
    VISITING NEIGHBORS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • WF
    WILD FLOWER FOR KIDS
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
2
Federal Defenders of New York Inc

The organization provides representation and related defense services to indigent persons charged with federal crimes.

Crime & Legal
3
Pqa Inc

Optimizing health by advancing the quality of medication use.

Health
4
Foundation of New York State Nurses Inc

The center for nursing at the foundation of new york state nurses promotes nursing leadership, research, and education to enhance the health and wellbeing of new yorkers through preservation of its history and advancement of the profession.

—
5
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health
6
International Assoc of Firefighters Local 854

The organization was established to further the interests of its membership by seeking improved terms and conditions of employment, to render moral and material aid to members as needed, to provide representation and/or counsel in legal…

—
7
Queens Legal Services Corporation

Queens legal services corporation is a not-for-profit corporation organized for the purposes of providing legal assistance to indigent persons in the new york city area in noncriminal proceedings or matters.

Crime & Legal
8
Do for One Nyc

To serve people with developmental disabilities

Human Services
9
New York Disaster Interfaith Services Inc

Founded in 2002, following 9/11, nydis is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit faith-based federation of over 60 diverse judicatories, disaster human services providers, and charitable organizations who work in partnership to provide disaster readiness,…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Bronx County Medical Society

Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy

Health
12
Nys Funeral Directors Association Inc

To preserve and enhance the high standards of integrity and honor existing in the funeral directing profession so as to better serve the public interest, to further the professional education of the members and to promote uniformity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Osborne Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILD FLOWER FOR KIDS: $50,000 · OtherWILD FLOWER FOR KIDSVISITING NEIGHBORS INC: $18,000 · OtherVISITING NEIGHBORS INCTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $18,000 · OtherTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INCPECONIC BAY MEDICAL CENTER: $14,000 · OtherPECONIC BAY MEDICAL CENTERFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $4,000 · Other+3 more: $5,000 · OtherNEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $49,350 · Arts & CultureNEWPORT FESTIVALS FO…FOOD EDUCATION FUND INC: $36,000 · EducationFOOD EDUCATION FU…QUOGUE FREE LIBRARY INC: $6,500 · EducationQUOGUE FREE LIBRA…CURE DUCHENNE: $18,000 · HealthCURE DUCHENNEBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $18,000 · HealthBLADDER CANCER …PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $14,000 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalFamily Dynamics Institute Inc: $7,200 · ReligionSTREETSQUASH INC: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$109,000Arts & Culture$49,350Education$42,500Health$36,000Environment$14,000International$8,000Religion$7,200Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC: $49,350 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD EDUCATION FUND INC: $36,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetVISITING NEIGHBORS INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCURE DUCHENNE: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPECONIC BAYKEEPER INC: $14,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Dynamics Institute Inc: $7,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetQUOGUE FREE LIBRARY INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetQUOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds CURE DUCHENNE ↗
  • Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC BAYKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Dynamics Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds QUOGUE FREE LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds QUOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margolis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margolis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Margolis Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Margolis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margolis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph