· Public charity
March On
An intergenerational organization dedicated to building and sustaining grassroots power.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $338,650 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $415,700 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $77,050 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
- $250k+1 grant · $315k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FUTURE INCUBATOR | $315,000 |
| BLACK VIOLIN FOUNDATION INC | $16,500 |
| CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION | $7,150 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BVBLACK VIOLIN FOUNDATION INC2× · 2024–2025 · $320k · revenue 0%
- MPMEZTLI PROJECTS INC2× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +30%
- TITREEAGE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $36k · revenue +185%
Funded once
- ASABOLISH SLAVERY NATIONAL NETWORK FDone grant, 2024 · $123k
- CLCIVICGEORGIA LLCone grant, 2022 · $52k
- SOSAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONAone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…
Our Voice Nuestra Voice is a nation-building organization, anchoring ancestry while building Black and Brown solidarity in New Orleans. We remember our shared culture and language, reconnect to the land, and organize our community around…
Electoral Collective coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.
Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…
Jolt Initiative is a non-profit organization that increases the civic participation of Latinos in Texas to build a stronger democracy and ensure that everyone's voice is heard.
Nextgen america empowers young people to engage in the democratic process through voter registration and civic engagement on issues of public policy. this is achieved through innovative digital outreach, communications, and grassroots…
Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.
The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.
La voice action's mission is to build multi-racial, interfaith power to win policies that transforms los angeles into a county that reflects the human dignity of all people, with racial equity and abundance for all.
Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.
The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.
Electoral Collective Action coordinates a broad-based coalition of existing entities active in the climate justice and community organizing space to raise public awareness and educational opportunities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leaders Igniting Transformation Action Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Environmental Stewardship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLACK VIOLIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEZTLI PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds Georgia Youth Justice Coalition for Action Inc ↗
- Who funds TREEAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds 18BY VOTE INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ANGELS GATE CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES ADVOCACY ↗
- Who funds We Vote We Win ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH ON MARYLAND ↗
- Who funds PODER NC ACTION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN ADVOCACY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI JOBS WITH JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds HOOD TO HOLLER INC ↗
- Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY NC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIDOS MN ↗
- Who funds ARCHCITY DEFENDERS ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC ↗
- Who funds Black Voters Matter Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds VOTERS ORGANIZED TO EDUCATE-VOTE ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds BLACK MALE VOTER PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Tides Advocacy · Tides Foundation · America Votes · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Women Donors Network Action · Center for Community Change Action · Pro-Democracy Campaign · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Clean and Prosperous America · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization March On funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to March On?
Find your warmest path to March On through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.