Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marasek Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$538k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$829kHuman Services$305kAnimals$151kInternational$80kArts & Culture$45kHousing & Shelter$35kHealth$5kCivil Rights$3k
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $300k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $193k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$140,000
RAHAB'S RETREAT RANCH$53,000
BEYOND OURSELVES$45,000
THE REMNANT CHURCH$40,000
BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE$25,000
BETHEL CHURCH REDDING$20,000
IRIS GLOBAL$20,000
CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS$20,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$20,000
CHRIST TO THE WORLD MINISTRIES$20,000
OCEANS CHURCH$20,000
KVNE$20,000
MOTION CHURCH$10,000
JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES$10,000
OPERATION MILITARY BLESSINGS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A21 USA INC: $5k → 11%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $30k → 16%LONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDA: $5k → 16%PREBORN: $3k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $25k → 16%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE: $25k → 16%ASBURY HOUSE CHILD ENRICHMENT CENTE: $3k → 16%ASBURY HOUSE CHILD ENRICHMENT CENTE: $3k → 16%ASBURY HOUSE CHILD ENRICHMENT CENTE: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IA
IN
CA
CO
TN
NC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 22 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+82%

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +3%
  • CT
    Christ to the World Ministries Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +24%
  • IG
    IRIS GLOBAL
    2× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF GOD WORLD MISSIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • DO
    D O R S COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
2
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
3
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
4
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
5
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
6
Life As Mission
Unclassified
7
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
8
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
9
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
10
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
11
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
12
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A21 Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christ to the World Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $190,000 · OtherLIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCHRAHAB'S RETREAT RANCH: $151,000 · OtherRAHAB'S RETREAT RANCHTHE REMNANT CHURCH: $135,000 · OtherTHE REMNANT CHURCHBEYOND OURSELVES: $100,000 · OtherBEYOND OURSELVESBETHEL CHURCH OF REDDING: $80,000 · OtherBETHEL CHURCH OF REDDINGOCEANS CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherOCEANS CHURCHFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $60,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYKVNE: $35,000 · Other+10 more: $149,000 · Other+10 moreChrist to the World Ministries Inc: $60,000 · ReligionChrist to th…CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS: $60,000 · ReligionCHRIST FOR A…JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES: $30,000 · ReligionJERICHO ROAD…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S …LONGVIEW DREAM CENTER: $140,000 · Food & NutritionLONGVIEW D…BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesOperation Military Blessings Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesASBURY HOUSE CHILD ENRICHMENT CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesA21 USA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesLONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesIRIS GLOBAL: $60,000 · InternationalHERE AM I MINISTRIES: $15,000 · InternationalEAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Other$960,000Religion$165,000Food & Nutrition$140,000Human Services$109,500International$75,000Civil Rights$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLONGVIEW DREAM CENTER: $140,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChrist to the World Ministries Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetIRIS GLOBAL: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES: $30,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetHIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHERE AM I MINISTRIES: $15,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Military Blessings Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetASBURY HOUSE CHILD ENRICHMENT CENTER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetA21 USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LONGVIEW DREAM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Christ to the World Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds IRIS GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds JERICHO ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HIWAY 80 RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HERE AM I MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds D O R S COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Military Blessings Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY HOUSE CHILD ENRICHMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AERIAL RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds A21 USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CHILD ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS11.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marasek Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marasek Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marasek’s filings →

    More from the funding graph