Skip to content

· Community foundation

Map Foundation Inc

To provide support to programs that benefit young people by supplying ongoing opportunities for mentoring as well as the development of well rounded individuals who will be of benefit to our communities.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$324k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.4MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.1MYouth Development$374kCommunity Improvement$182kRecreation & Sports$150kPhilanthropy$142kReligion$122kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $1,073,281, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,096,837 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,556 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $154k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $589k
  • $250k+1 grant · $324k
$25,110
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIONSGATE MINISTRIES$324,226
KENTUCKY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$200,000
Individual grant recipient$154,767
Individual grant recipient$124,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLE$55,428
Individual grant recipient$55,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
CASSIDY SCHOOL$25,110
SPORT LIFE FOUNDATION$25,000
NORTH FLORIDA FLOOD RELIEF$15,000
REFUGE FOR WOMEN$12,500
CRU FOUNDATION$11,250
FLAT TOP FUND LLC$10,000
THE CUTE SYNDROME FOUNDATION$10,000
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING KENYA$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY: $50k → 12%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $236k → 5%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $324k → 16%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $120k → 16%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $117k → 16%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $84k → 16%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $70k → 16%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $42k → 16%LIONSGATE MINISTRIES: $30k → 16%LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $12k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
NJ
MO
KY
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 15 repeat orgs$527k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$4.6M
$436k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+25%

Still filing today

33%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    Lions Gate Ministries Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +104% · 46% of their budget
  • LH
    LEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $58k · revenue +77%
  • LR
    LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $42k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • LF
    LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2022 · $78k · revenue +25%
  • AI
    ATHLETES IN ACTION-FIELDHOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • SJ
    St Johns Bread & Life Program Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Lexington Inc

Provides health and healing to neighbors in need through charitable healthcare clinics.

Health
2
Bread of Life Mission

Bringing hope, healing, and recovery to seattle's homeless through a christ-centered approach.

Human Services
3
Habitat for Humanity of the Lexington North Carolina Area Inc

Create decent, affordable housing for those in need, and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

Housing & Shelter
4
The Raleigh Rescue Mission Inc

Believing every individual has sacred value, we equip people to impact the world for good through the love of jesus christ.

Human Services
5
Lynchburg Covenant Fellowship Incorporated

Provision of safe and affordable housing.

—
6
Light of Life Ministries Inc

Light of life transforms lives through the love of christ by providing food, shelter, and hope to men, women, and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, or addiction to restore them as healthy members of our community.

Human Services
7
Life Impact Inc

To offer r.e.s.t. to pastors, global workers, and christian leaders: rest. encouragement. safety. transformation.

Religion
8
Wnc Lighthouse Inc

The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…

Human Services
9
Lawrence Community Shelter Inc

The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…

Housing & Shelter
10
Long Beach Rescue Mission

Provide temporary housing, clothing, counseling services, food and financial assistance for homeless individuals.

Housing & Shelter
11
Sojourn Landing Dba the Landing

Our mission is to serve survivors of human trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation with a trauma-informed approach fueled by the love of Christ.

Human Services
12
City Mission - Living Stones Inc

Provide comprehensive housing and support services to the homeless. housing options include emergency shelter, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lexington Cancer Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ymca Blue Ridge Assembly Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,339,751 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKENTUCKY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $1,040,146 · OtherKENTUCKY CHILDRENS HOSPITALFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLE: $347,428 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLEIndividual grant recipient: $223,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+20 more: $750,079 · Other+20 moreLions Gate Ministries Inc: $1,022,516 · Human ServicesLions Gate Ministries In…YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesLEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $42,125 · Human ServicesLEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $78,000 · Community ImprovementDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $41,261 · Housing & ShelterREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterLEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $58,193 · AnimalsSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $50,000 · Food & NutritionTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CUTE SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health
Other$3,700,654Human Services$1,114,641Community Improvement$78,000Housing & Shelter$63,761Animals$58,193Food & Nutrition$50,000Philanthropy$30,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLions Gate Ministries Inc: $1,022,516 over 7y, 46% of budgetLEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS: $78,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $58,193 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $42,125 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $41,261 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lions Gate Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds St Johns Bread & Life Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds YMCA BLUE RIDGE ASSEMBLY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CUTE SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Map Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Map Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Map Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Map Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Map’s filings →

    More from the funding graph