Skip to content
Mani Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mani Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2021
12
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Mani Charitable Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Mani Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $105k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
13
’18
9
’19
20
’20
9
’21
5
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$2.0MEducation$180kHuman Services$66kHousing & Shelter$65kCrime & Legal$59kInternational$28kArts & Culture$15kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2021 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUILDING CHANGES$25,000
YWCA SEATTLE KING SNOHOMISH COUNTY$25,000
INDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$15,385
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$10,000
THE SOPHIA WAY$10,000
BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERISTY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$3,500
ASHA FOR EDUCATION$3,000
NAMI EASTSIDE$2,686
PRATHAM USA$2,570
FEEDING AMERICA$2,500
AID INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIVE ONE DOLLAR A DAY: $100 → 10%THE SOPHIA WAY: $16k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $10k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $3k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$362k · 13 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$362k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+46%

Still filing today

92%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $90k · revenue +46%
  • AC
    API CHAYA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $59k · revenue +196%
  • IA
    INDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $34k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • MP
    Maris Placegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +80%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BELLEVUE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • T
    Tasveergraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shadhika Project

Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…

—
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Perigee Fund

Our mission is to shift policies and systems to increasingly value and embed supports for caregiver and infant mental health in the places where families are during pregnancy and early childhood. perigee is organized & operated as a…

Health
4
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
5
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
6
Prasaad
Religion
7
Asha Partners

To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.

Religion
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
10
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
11
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
12
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pratidhwani. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
28/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,967,346 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $90,000 · EducationBELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $25,030 · EducationUNIVERSITY PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $17,226 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERISTY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $30,500 · OtherYWCA SEATTLE KING SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $25,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BELLEVUE: $5,000 · OtherUPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES: $21,408 · OtherAsha for Education: $5,000 · OtherPRATHAM USA: $11,136 · OtherPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $5,900 · OtherPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $4,593 · OtherMaris Place: $8,000 · OtherTasveer: $5,000 · Other+14 more: $11,950 · OtherAPI CHAYA: $58,710 · Crime & LegalBUILDING CHANGES: $32,500 · HealthNAMI Eastside: $2,686 · HealthFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $1,500 · Health+3 more: $1,923 · HealthTHE SOPHIA WAY: $30,750 · Human ServicesHOPELINK: $2,500 · Human ServicesOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE: $2,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesINDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $34,235 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Community Improvement$1,967,346Education$137,256Other$133,487Crime & Legal$58,710Health$38,609Human Services$37,350Arts & Culture$35,735

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,967,346 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAPI CHAYA: $58,710 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetINDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $34,235 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBUILDING CHANGES: $32,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SOPHIA WAY: $30,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $25,030 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES: $21,408 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $17,226 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $11,136 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMaris Place: $8,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetPLEDGELING FOUNDATION: $5,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAsha for Education: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $4,593 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Eastside: $2,686 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPELINK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $1,123 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEDGEBROOK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSai Parivar Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKing County Sexual Assault Resource Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKiran Anjali Project: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRATIDHWANI: $500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS OUT CANCER: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMotley Zoo Animal Rescue: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVE ONE DOLLAR A DAY: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Norcliffe Foundat…United Way of King Co…Salesforce FoundationAven FoundationSatya and Rao Remala …ImpactassetsincAkila and S Somasegar…Naveen and Anu Jain F…Overlake Medical Cent…
Seattle FoundationWA24.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Salesforce Foundation · Aven Foundation · Satya and Rao Remala Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Akila and S Somasegar Family Foundation · Naveen and Anu Jain Family Foundation · Overlake Medical Center & Clinics

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mani Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mani Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mani’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home