· Private foundation
Naveen and Anu Jain Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION | $87,500 |
| ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS | $10,000 |
| XPRIZE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MILAAN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| EDU-GIRLS INC | $10,000 |
| ISKON-VEDIC CULTURAL CENTER | $5,000 |
| EAT HAPPY | $5,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL DIGAMBER JAIN ORGANIZATION | $3,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $2,000 |
| THE SOPHIA WAY | $1,000 |
| INDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $300k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE7× · 2017–2023 · $211k · revenue +160%
- WMWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC5× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +53%
- CFChopra Foundation2× · 2018–2021 · $53k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- PUPEACE UNIVERSITY MEXICOone grant, 2021 · $1.0M
- UWUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue -38%
- UWUnited Wayone grant, 2017 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…
The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…
The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.
Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.
Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.
Girl effect works for a future in which every girl is in control of her body, her health, her learning and her livelihood. we work across africa and asia with adolescent girls and young women using the power of media and technology to…
Invisible girl project's (igp) mission is to save girls' lives and end female gendercide in india. igp raises global awareness about this issue, partners with indian organizations that rescue and care for vulnerable girls, pursues justice,…
Beyond capital fund (bcf) is a women-led evergreen fund structured as a u.s. 501(c)3 nonprofit entity that has been a pioneer in impact and gender lens investing. since 2009, bcf has invested in conscious leaders building enterprises to…
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund and the most unlike its peers is Eat Happy Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Chopra Foundation ↗
- Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CRY-CHILD RIGHTS AND YOU AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds X PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDU-GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds NOBILITY IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds Milaan Foundation ↗
- Who funds Global GLOW ↗
- Who funds ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds Eat Happy Now ↗
- Who funds NW SHARE ↗
- Who funds Womens Funding Alliance ↗
- Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Mani Charitable Foundation · Jagran Foundation · Aven Foundation · Satya and Rao Remala Foundation · Ellison Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Verizon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Naveen and Anu Jain Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Naveen and Anu Jain Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Naveen and Anu Jain Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.