Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Overlake Medical Center & Clinics

To provide comprehensive hospital and other healthcare and wellness related services and provide education, research, and other activities designed to promote the general health of the community.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$20MHuman Services$276kEducation$128kArts & Culture$118kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kPhilanthropy$55kHousing & Shelter$53kCommunity Improvement$40kCivil Rights$15kOther$568k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.6M
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$820M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,634,664
NAMI EASTSIDE$30,000
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$30,000
BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$25,000
YOUTH EASTSIDE SERVICES$15,000
MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION$15,000
WASHINGTON POISON CENTER$15,000
TOGETHER CENTER$15,000
THE SOPHIA WAY$10,000
CANCER LIFELINE$10,000
MARY'S PLACE SEATTLE$10,000
SEATTLE OUT & PROUD FOUNDATION$8,000
BELLEVUE LIFESPRING$7,500
LIFEWIRE$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LIFEWIRE: $10k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $8k → 9%LIFEWIRE: $8k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $10k → 9%BELLEVUE LIFESPRING: $10k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $10k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $10k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $10k → 9%SOPHIA WAY THE: $10k → 9%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICES: $6k → 9%HOPELINK: $30k → 9%HOPELINK: $30k → 9%NAMI EASTSIDE: $30k → 9%HOPELINK: $15k → 9%NAMI WALK WASHINGTON: $10k → 9%NAMI WASHINGTON: $8k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 28 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
13

Total granted

$22M
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+0%

Still filing today

96%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20M · revenue +25%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $135k · revenue +33%
  • YE
    Youth Eastside Services
    7× · 2019–2025 · $100k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • EC
    EASTSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +176%
  • AH
    ATTAIN HOUSING
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -76%
  • CF
    CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
4
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
5
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
6
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
7
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
8
Washington Association for Community Health

The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…

—
9
One Community Health

Advance health and social justice for all members of our community.

—
10
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
11
Seattle Economic Development Fund Business Impact Nw

To provide economic development financing to serve the needs of small businesses in the state of washington that would not qualify for private financing under conventional financing criteria.

Community Improvement
12
Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overlake Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHomeless Services & SupportAffordable Senior Housing &…Youth Leadership DevelopmentChildren's Charitable Found…Independent Elementary Scho…Immigrant and Refugee Servi…Regional Business & Economi…Washington State Advocacy O…History and Cultural MuseumsHealthcare & Social Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr12%38%35–55yr12%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr19%2%20–35yr12%95%35–55yr12%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
14%
1,719/12,697

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
24/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $19,827,129 · HealthOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+10 more — $662,013 · HealthOverlake Hospital Auxiliaries — $278,464 · OtherBELLEVUE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $92,500 · OtherISSAQUAH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $71,000 · OtherTOGETHER CENTER — $38,000 · OtherGREATER ISSAQUAH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $24,000 · OtherEASTSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND — $25,000 · OtherONEREDMOND — $30,000 · Other+9 more — $116,500 · OtherTHE SOPHIA WAY — $80,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINK — $75,000 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE — $40,000 · Human ServicesLifeWire — $25,000 · Human ServicesOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE — $25,000 · Human ServicesNAMI WASHINGTON — $17,500 · Human Services+2 more — $13,500 · Human ServicesBELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $90,000 · EducationBELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationESSEX COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORPORATION — $8,000 · EducationBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM — $110,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE OUT AND PROUD INC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST HEALTHCARE RESPONSE NETWORK — $70,000 · Public Safety & DisasterLAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $55,000 · Philanthropy
Health$20,489,142Other$675,464Human Services$276,000Education$128,000Arts & Culture$118,000Public Safety & Disaster$70,000Philanthropy$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $19,827,129 over 9y, 21% of budgetOverlake Hospital Auxiliaries — $278,464 over 5y, 88% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM — $110,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetYouth Eastside Services — $100,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNAMI Eastside — $92,500 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetBELLEVUE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $92,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetBELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $82,464 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOPHIA WAY — $80,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOPELINK — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISSAQUAH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $71,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HEALTHCARE RESPONSE NETWORK — $70,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetWASHINGTON POISON CENTER — $66,549 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetBLOODWORKS — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $48,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIC ONE FOUNDATION — $47,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTOGETHER CENTER — $38,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCANCER LIFELINE — $32,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetONEREDMOND — $30,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLifeWire — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEASTSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER ISSAQUAH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $24,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI WASHINGTON — $17,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetATTAIN HOUSING — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMERCER ISLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $12,900 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIRKLAND DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGREATER KIRKLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $8,100 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetESSEX COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORPORATION — $8,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSEATTLE OUT AND PROUD INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChinese Information and Service Center — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…United Way of King Co…Swedish Health Servic…Thurston Charitable F…Bellevue Rotary Found…Aven FoundationCharis FundWilkins Charitable Fo…Apex FoundationWindermere Foundation
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE42.5× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Swedish Health Services · Thurston Charitable Foundation · Bellevue Rotary Foundation · Aven Foundation · Charis Fund · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · Apex Foundation · Windermere Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Overlake Medical Center & Clinics funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines