Skip to content

· Private foundation

Malloure Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$109kFood & Nutrition$50kHuman Services$14kEducation$11kYouth Development$8kEnvironment$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$586k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mid-Ohio Food Collective$5,000
ProMusica Chamber Orchestra$3,090
Columbus Museum of Art$3,000
Westerville Area Resource Ministry$3,000
Manna Food Project$2,500
Worthington Historical Society$2,500
Northmen Den Youth Services$2,500
Friends of Clements LibraryUniv of$2,000
Lifecare Alliance$2,000
WOSU Public MediaOSU Foundation$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Inniswood Garden Society$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Westerville Area Resource Ministry: $6k → 15%Westerville Area Resource Ministry: $3k → 15%Westerville Area Resource Ministry: $3k → 15%WESTERVILLE AREA RESOURCE MINISTRY: $2k → 15%Westerville Area Resource Ministry: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 13 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$185k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+51%

Still filing today

62%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART
    6× · 2020–2025 · $72k · revenue +28%
  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +5%
  • WH
    WORTHINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • CO
    Central Ohio Alumni - Univ of Michi
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • ND
    Northmen Dens Youth Service
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
2
Ohio Tri County Food Alliance Dba Second Harvest Food Bank

The mission of ohio tri county food alliance/second harvest food bank is to alleviate hunger in clark, champaign, and logan counties by sourcing and distributing nutritious food to people in need, building community partnerships, and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
4
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
5
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
6
Mothers' Milk Bank of the Western Great Lakes Inc

To provide human milk to improve infant health and save lives.

Health
7
Feeding America West Michigan

We gather and distribute food to relieve hunger and increase food security in west michigan and the upper peninsula. contributions and net assets consist primarily of donated food for distribution.

—
8
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

—
9
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank

The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…

Food & Nutrition
12
West Central Community Action

In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westerville Area Resource Ministry; the most unlike its peers is Inniswood Garden Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $72,000 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ARTWORTHINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $21,116 · Arts & CultureWORTHINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCMid-Ohio Foodbank: $26,000 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $16,000 · OtherTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD…PRO MUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF COLUMBUS INC: $13,590 · OtherPRO MUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF COLUMBUS INCCAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $6,000 · OtherCAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHENCentral Ohio Alumni - Univ of Michi: $5,000 · OtherCentral Ohio Alumni - Univ of MichiNorthmen Den Youth Services: $5,000 · OtherNorthmen Den Youth ServicesFriends of Clements LibraryUniv of: $4,000 · OtherNorthmen Dens Youth Service: $3,000 · Other+5 more: $6,450 · Other+5 moreWESTERVILLE AREA RESOURCE MINISTRY: $14,000 · Human ServicesWALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY: $3,000 · Food & NutritionLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $2,000 · Food & NutritionINNISWOOD GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $2,050 · EnvironmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,045 · InternationalDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationLITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 · Animals
Arts & Culture$93,116Other$85,040Human Services$14,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Environment$2,050International$2,045Education$500Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART: $72,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORTHINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $21,116 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT: $16,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERVILLE AREA RESOURCE MINISTRY: $14,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPRO MUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF COLUMBUS INC: $13,590 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINNISWOOD GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $2,050 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLUMBUS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds WORTHINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WESTERVILLE AREA RESOURCE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds PRO MUSICA CHAMBER ORCHESTRA OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds WALLOON LAKE ASSOCIATION AND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds INNISWOOD GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds DELTA DELTA DELTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH16.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Malloure Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Malloure Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Malloure Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph