Skip to content
Malley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Malley Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Health$105kHuman Services$90kInternational$75kCommunity Improvement$30kArts & Culture$20kCrime & Legal$15kEnvironment$15kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$842k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Dana Farber Cancer Institute$10,000
18 Degrees$10,000
National Diaper Bank Network$10,000
World Central Kitchen$10,000
Elizabeth Freeman Center$10,000
Neighborhood Forest$5,000
People's Pantry$5,000
Volunteers in Medicine$5,000
One Can Help$5,000
Planned Parenthood$5,000
My Sister's Place$5,000
Community Help in Park Slope$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Community Help in Park Slope: $5k → 20%National Diaper Bank Network: $10k → 12%Community Help in Park Slope: $5k → 20%National Diaper Bank Network: $5k → 12%Community Help in Park Slope: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
MD
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$296k · 16 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$296k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+8%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    ELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +85%
  • 1D
    18 DEGREES INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $25k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -6%
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
3
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
4
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
5
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
6
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
8
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
9
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
12
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Can Help Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC: $40,000 · OtherELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC18 DEGREES INC: $30,000 · Other18 DEGREES INCPlanned Parenthood: $25,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodMy Sister's Place: $20,000 · OtherMy Sister's PlaceArts in the Armed Services: $15,260 · OtherArts in the Armed ServicesACLU: $15,000 · OtherACLUMIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherMIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCHOPEWELL FUND: $9,000 · Other+4 more: $20,000 · Other+4 moreINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $25,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL C…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $25,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTA…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN I…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $25,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer …CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $20,262 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS F…VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC: $15,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDIC…NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $10,197 · HealthNATIONAL PEDIATRIC …COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $15,260 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesKIND INC: $15,260 · Crime & LegalONE CAN HELP INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PEOPLES PANTRY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionROOTS RISING INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$184,260International$85,000Health$70,459Human Services$30,260Crime & Legal$15,260Youth Development$15,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget18 DEGREES INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $20,262 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $15,260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $15,260 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetONE CAN HELP INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $10,197 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIGRAINE RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEOPLES PANTRY: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD FOREST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetROOTS RISING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lee Bank Foundation I…Berkshire United Way …Berkshire Taconic Com…Gilson Family Foundat…Jane and Jack Fitzpat…Donald C McGraw Found…The Feigenbaum Founda…Josephine and Louise …Berkshire Bank Founda…Jewish Communal FundNetwork for GoodVanguard Charitable E…
Lee Bank Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire United Way Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Gilson Family Foundation Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Malley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Malley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Elizabeth Freeman Center Inc: 76% of income from government
  • 18 Degrees Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc: 10% of income from government
  • One Can Help Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Roots Rising Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Malley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Malley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Malley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home