· Private foundation
Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $65k
- $10k–50k74 grants · $1.8M
- $50k–250k33 grants · $2.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INC | $215,000 |
| CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC | $210,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS MARITIME ACADEMY | $200,000 |
| RESIST INC | $185,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BERKSHIRES INC | $125,000 |
| 18 DEGREES INC | $100,000 |
| SMART FROM THE START INC | $100,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC | $100,000 |
| CONSTRUCT INC | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF CAPE COD INC | $90,000 |
| URBAN REVIVAL INC CITY LIFEVIDA URBANA | $85,000 |
| THE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC | $82,500 |
| AYNI INSTITUTE INC | $75,000 |
| LA COLLABORATIVA INC | $75,000 |
| BERKSHIRE FAMILY YMCA INC | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
145 repeat relationships — 104 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB OF THE BERKSHIRES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $875k · revenue +65%
- RIRESIST INC5× · 2020–2024 · $669k · revenue +242%
- SFSMART FROM THE START INC5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- TBTHE BRIEN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICESone grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +21%
- PAPOWERSWITCH ACTIONone grant, 2023 · $65k
- BMBERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…
The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
We create opportunities for the people of massachusetts to transform their lives and build a more equitable commonwealth through the humanities.
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
Our mission is to mobilize people, partnerships and resources to catalyze change that strengthens the communities served.
Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.
Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Teen Empowerment Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Hyams Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
156 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 156 of the 190 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB OF THE BERKSHIRES INC ↗
- Who funds RESIST INC ↗
- Who funds SMART FROM THE START INC ↗
- Who funds 18 DEGREES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF CAPE COD INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION ↗
- Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HAYMARKET PEOPLE'S FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCT INC ↗
- Who funds LA COLABORATIVA INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds HURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds GLADYS ALLEN BRIGHAM COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COMMUNITIES ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE 300 COMMITTEE LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds FALMOUTH HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds FLYING CLOUD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE BERKSHIRE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR MASSACHUSETTS EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE LENNY ZAKIM FUND ↗
- Who funds RAILROAD STREET YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP ↗
- Who funds ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds URBAN REVIVAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire United Way Inc · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · The Hyams Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Barr Foundation · Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · Gilson Family Foundation Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Upper Housatonic Valley National He — 80% of income from government
- Elizabeth Freeman Center Inc — 76% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Northstar Learning Centers Inc — 63% of income from government
- Tapestry Health Systems Inc — 60% of income from government
- 18 Degrees Inc — 60% of income from government
- Child Care of the Berkshires Inc — 59% of income from government
- Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc — 53% of income from government
- Duffy Health Center Inc — 51% of income from government
- East Boston Social Centers Inc — 50% of income from government
- Cape Cod Children's Place Inc — 47% of income from government
- Berkshire County Head Start Child Development Program Inc — 45% of income from government
- Railroad Street Youth Project Inc — 45% of income from government
- Vermont Land Trust Inc — 42% of income from government
- Gladys Allen Brigham Community Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Buzzards Bay Coalition — 37% of income from government
- Pediatric Development Center Inc — 37% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Second Street Second Chances Inc — 33% of income from government
- Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp — 32% of income from government
- South Coast Lgbtq Network Inc — 29% of income from government
- Berkshire Grown Inc — 28% of income from government
- Marine Biological Laboratory — 20% of income from government
- Nopi Inc — 14% of income from government
- Community Health Programs Incorporated — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- New England Innocence Project — 12% of income from government
- Sea Education Association Inc — 12% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
- Commonwealth Kitchen Inc — 9% of income from government
- Berkshire Immigrant Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Community Health Center of Cape Cod Inc — 9% of income from government
- Parent Professional Advocacy League Inc — 8% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Berkshire Dream Center Inc — 7% of income from government
- Woods Hole Film Festival Inc — 7% of income from government
- Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Smart From the Start Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Center for Teen Empowerment Inc — 7% of income from government
- Flying Cloud Institute Inc — 6% of income from government
- Roots Rising Inc — 6% of income from government
- Gosnold Inc — 5% of income from government
- Zumix Inc — 5% of income from government
- Construct Inc — 4% of income from government
- Girls On the Run Greater Boston — 4% of income from government
- Berkshire Medical Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- West End House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Transformative Culture Project Inc F/K/a Press Pass Tv Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bikes Not Bombs Inc — 2% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Hancock Shaker Village Inc — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
- Berkshire Agricultural Ventures Inc — 1% of income from government
- Berkshire Theatre Group Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brazilian Women's Group Inc — 0% of income from government
- Community Labor United Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.