Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Arts & Culture$3.0MHuman Services$996kHousing & Shelter$789kCommunity Improvement$518kEducation$447kFood & Nutrition$390kHealth$385kRecreation & Sports$365kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $910k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP$250,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
CONSTRUCT INC$150,000
BERKSHIRE FAMILY YMCA$125,000
ROOTS RISING$100,000
ELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER$100,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE BERKSHIRES$75,000
BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY$60,000
NORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM$50,000
WEB DU BOIS CENTER FOR FREEDOM$50,000
OTIS PRESERVATION TRUST$50,000
BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES$15,000
SAINT JAMES PLACE$15,000
BERKSHIRE CENTER FOR JUSTICE$8,500
LITERACY NETWORK$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $316k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH: $100k → 12%RIVERBROOK RESIDENCE INC: $10k → 12%RIVERBROOK RESIDENCE INC: $5k → 12%BERKSHIRE IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $100k → 12%LIFE NEEDS COOP DBA STANTON HOME: $25k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS: $25k → 12%LIFE NEEDS COOP INC: $15k → 12%LIFE NEEDS CO-OP INC: $10k → 12%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $5k → 12%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $3k → 12%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $3k → 12%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $3k → 12%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $3k → 12%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.4M · 39 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
62

Total granted

$5.4M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+28%

Still filing today

87%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CONSTRUCT INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $489k · revenue +186%
  • BT
    BERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +8%
  • BW
    BERKSHIRE WALDORF SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $255k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TI
    TRIPLEX INC
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE BERKSHIRES AND SOUTHERN VERMONT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue +30%
  • KC
    KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture
2
Berkshire Carousel Inc

To own and operate a carousel for public use in Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

Arts & Culture
3
Berks Arts Council

The mission of the berks arts council is to inspire, engage and unite our community through arts education, collaboration, and presentation.

Arts & Culture
4
1BERKSHIRE Strategic Alliance Inc

To strengthen and grow the berkshire economy using an innovative collaborative approach among the region's business, tourism, economic, and creative development efforts.

Community Improvement
5
Berk County Regional Employment Board

To provide policy guidance, selection and oversight and to organize programs for the purpose of work force development in berkshire county, massachusetts.

Employment
6
Boston Center for the Arts Inc

Boston center for the arts (bca) is a not-for-profit performing and visual arts campus that supports working artists to create, perform, and exhibit new works; develops new audiences; and connects the arts to the community.

Arts & Culture
7
Berkshire Athenaeum

The berkshire athenaeum, pittsfield's public library, exists to initiate, nurture and feed a passion for knowledge and learning. the library offers people of all ages the materials and services necessary to satisfy an appetite for…

—
8
Berkshire Opera Festival Inc

Entertain and enrich the lives of people of all ages and backgrounds throughout the berkshire region by providing accessible and affordable performances of a broad range of operas with the highest artistic standards.

Arts & Culture
9
Barnstable Land Trust Inc

Preservation of undeveloped land in the town of barnstable and nearby areas

Environment
10
Brookline Arts Center

The Brookline Arts Center is a visual arts center committed to bringing the community meaningful experience in the arts through classes, exhibitions and outreach.

Arts & Culture
11
Berkshire International Film Festival Corp

The berkshire international film festival (biff) is for filmmakers and film lovers alike to be entertained, educated and inspired. biff seeks to celebrate independent film and to recognize and pay tribute to accomplished artists on both…

Education
12
Berkshire Dance Theatre Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing the highest quality dance and performing arts education. the joy, confidence and mutual respect our students gain enhance their communities and continue to guide them throughout their lives.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berkshire South Regional Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyBerkshire County Community …Arts & Culture OrganizationsPrivate Charitable Foundati…Berkshire County Community …Community Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr13%8%5–10yr17%15%10–20yr18%31%20–35yr15%19%35–55yr14%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%3%<5yr13%5%5–10yr17%12%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr15%20%35–55yr14%40%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/68
the rest of the field
9%
96/1,080

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/67
Grantees still filing
45/67
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BERKSHIRE FAMILY YMCA — $500,000 · OtherBERKSHIRE FAMILY YMCAEDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC — $220,000 · OtherUPPER HOUSATONIC VALLEY NAT HERITAG — $185,000 · OtherCHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INC — $160,000 · OtherTRIPLEX INC — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherBERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $210,000 · Other+61 more — $2,909,699 · Other+61 moreBERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC — $275,000 · Arts & CultureBERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP …JACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC — $250,000 · Arts & CultureJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FES…SHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC — $220,000 · Arts & CultureSHAKESPEARE & COMPANY IN…NORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM AT STOCKBRIDGE INC — $210,000 · Arts & CultureNORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM A…GUTHRIE CENTER CORP — $158,000 · Arts & CultureGUTHRIE CENTER CORPWEST STOCKBRIDGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $110,000 · Arts & CultureWEST STOCKBRIDGE HISTORI…BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTR…BERKSHIRE PULSE INC — $95,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WEB DU BOIS CENTER FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY INC — $95,000 · Arts & CultureMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $95,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $175,500 · Arts & Culture+8 moreBERKSHIRE WALDORF SCHOOL INC — $255,000 · EducationBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC — $120,000 · EducationSTOCKBRIDGE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $80,000 · EducationBERKSHIRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $40,000 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Education+1 more — $12,500 · EducationCONSTRUCT INC — $489,000 · Housing & ShelterGREENAGERS INC — $155,000 · Food & NutritionROOTS RISING INC — $120,000 · Food & NutritionPITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $44,400 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC — $35,000 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE GROWN INC — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $500 · Food & NutritionPEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $235,000 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC — $125,000 · HealthTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $100,000 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR ECOTECHNOLOGY INC — $75,000 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC — $35,000 · Environment
Other$4,484,699Arts & Culture$1,783,500Education$532,500Housing & Shelter$489,000Food & Nutrition$379,900Health$360,000Environment$360,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONSTRUCT INC — $489,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetBERKSHIRE THEATRE GROUP INC — $275,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBERKSHIRE WALDORF SCHOOL INC — $255,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetJACOB'S PILLOW DANCE FESTIVAL INC — $250,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPEDIATRIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $235,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetSHAKESPEARE & COMPANY INC — $220,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC — $220,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBERKSHIRE SOUTH REGIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $210,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetNORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM AT STOCKBRIDGE INC — $210,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCHILD CARE OF THE BERKSHIRES INC — $160,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetGUTHRIE CENTER CORP — $158,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetGREENAGERS INC — $155,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetOTIS PRESERVATION TRUST INC — $148,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC — $125,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE-BERKSHIRES INC — $125,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE BIDWELL HOUSE INC — $120,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE BERKSHIRES AND SOUTHERN VERMONT INC — $120,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetROOTS RISING INC — $120,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC — $120,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWEST STOCKBRIDGE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $110,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetKRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELIZABETH FREEMAN CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHancock Shaker Village Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBERKSHIRE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC — $100,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetBERKSHIRE PULSE INC — $95,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE WEB DU BOIS CENTER FOR FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY INC — $95,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMAHAIWE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $95,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGREAT BARRINGTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $85,000 over 2y, 70% of budgetSTOCKBRIDGE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $80,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetBERKSHIRE FILM AND MEDIA COLLABORATIVE INC — $80,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR ECOTECHNOLOGY INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBERKSHIRE UNITED WAY INC — $75,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE INNOVATION CENTER INC — $62,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSCHUMACHER CENTER FOR A NEW ECONOMICS INC — $60,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLife Needs Coop Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBERKSHIRE NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMount Washington Historical Society — $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBerkshire Community College Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBERKSHIRE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $45,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetPITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $44,400 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBERKSHIRE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $40,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSAINT JAMES PLACE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetLEVER INC — $39,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC — $35,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC — $35,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Com…The Feigenbaum Founda…Lee Bank Foundation I…Berkshire Bank Founda…Berkshire United Way …Shoval FoundationDr Robert C & Tina So…Josephine and Louise …Donald C McGraw Found…Gilson Family Foundat…Berkshire Life Charit…The Velmans Foundatio…
Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA89.8× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire United Way Inc · Shoval Foundation · Dr Robert C & Tina Sohn Foundation · Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation · Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · Gilson Family Foundation Inc · Berkshire Life Charitable Foundation % Berkshire Life Insurance · The Velmans Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Elizabeth Freeman Center Inc — 76% of income from government
  • Riverbrook Residence Inc — 76% of income from government
  • Child Care of the Berkshires Inc — 59% of income from government
  • Gladys Allen Brigham Community Center Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Life Needs Coop Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Pediatric Development Center Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Berkshire Grown Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Lever Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Center for Ecotechnology Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Berkshire Scenic Railway Museum Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Berkshire Immigrant Center Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Roots Rising Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Berkshire Innovation Center Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Construct Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Community Access to the Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
  • Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Berkshire Natural Resources Council Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Hancock Shaker Village Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Guthrie Center Corp — 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Agricultural Ventures Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Edith Wharton Restoration Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Pulse Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Shakespeare & Company Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Becket Athenaeum Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Theatre Group Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Norman Rockwell Museum at Stockbridge Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Jacob's Pillow Dance Festival Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Stockbridge Library Association — 0% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust?

Find your warmest path to Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home