· Private foundation
Gilson Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $756k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $711k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRADLES TO CRAYONS | $150,220 |
| OPEN TABLE | $75,500 |
| ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| JOG YOUR MEMORY | $60,000 |
| GAINING GROUND | $50,500 |
| LEVER | $50,110 |
| PLAYBALL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| BERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDAT | $50,000 |
| PITTSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| CARE DIMENSIONS | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,500 |
| DIGNITY MATTERS | $34,610 |
| JEFF'S PLACE | $32,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MA | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $297k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $731k · revenue +202%
- JYJOG YOUR MEMORY 5K INC6× · 2018–2024 · $390k · revenue +25% · 47% of their budget
- OTOPEN TABLE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $252k · revenue +187%
Funded once
PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -3%- AVAVA'S VOICE INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · 76% of their budget
- TFTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERNone grant, 2022 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through events, workshops, promotions, advocacy and education highlighting locally-grown and produced food, the organization helps to create a thriving local food economy.
To alleviate hunger, food insecurity and social isolation by serving healthy and dignified noontime meals every weekday by providing education in making good, nutritional choices and by helping people access available food resources.
Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…
Food link is working to create a more equitable food system throughout greater boston by rescuing and distributing high-quality, customized food to under-resourced communities and by advocating for systems change.
Spoonfuls is an organization that facilitates the recovery and distribution of healthy, perishable food that would otherwise be discarded. spoonfuls works efficiently to deliver this food directly to the community organizations and…
The organization provides child care services to families through child care centers and a network of family child care homes. child care of the berkshires also strengthens families through support services and home visiting focused on…
The focus of the merrimack valley food bank is to help meet a person's most profound need - adequate nutrition and freedom from hunger. only through cooperative efforts can society initiate change, develop strategies to alleviate hunger,…
Full belly foods purchases food from farms and wholesalers and donates the food to low-income communities across the country.
The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.
To provide policy guidance, selection and oversight and to organize programs for the purpose of work force development in berkshire county, massachusetts.
To foster community partnerships, promote individual advocacy and create a pathway for growth and innovation by offering exceptional support and services to people with all abilities through the attraction, development and retention of…
Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Amputee Soccer Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds JOG YOUR MEMORY 5K INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Care Dimensions Inc ↗
- Who funds GAINING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY BALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT CHARITABLE ↗
- Who funds LEVER INC ↗
- Who funds Dignity Matters Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Jeff's Place Children's Bereavement Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Birthday Wishes Inc ↗
- Who funds SPUR INC ↗
- Who funds LA COLABORATIVA INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds Families in Transition ↗
- Who funds ROOTS RISING INC ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE NORTH SHORE INC ↗
- Who funds GREENAGERS INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRES BOUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds AVA'S VOICE INC ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Josephine and Louise Crane Foundation · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · Berkshire United Way Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Donald C McGraw Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gilson Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Extraspecialteas Inc — 83% of income from government
- Elizabeth Freeman Center Inc — 76% of income from government
- New North Citizens Council Inc — 75% of income from government
- Plummer Youth Promise Inc — 64% of income from government
- 18 Degrees Inc — 60% of income from government
- Gladys Allen Brigham Community Center Inc — 40% of income from government
- Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc — 35% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Root Ns Inc — 26% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
- Community Health Programs Incorporated — 13% of income from government
- New American Association of Massachusetts Inc — 12% of income from government
- Lever Inc — 10% of income from government
- Volunteers in Medicine-Berkshires Inc — 10% of income from government
- Leap for Education Inc — 9% of income from government
- Berkshire Immigrant Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
- Open Table Inc — 7% of income from government
- Greenagers Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Roots Rising Inc — 6% of income from government
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
- Construct Inc — 4% of income from government
- Community Access to the Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Spur Inc — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Berkshire Agricultural Ventures Inc — 1% of income from government
- Berkshire Theatre Group Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gilson Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Gilson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.