· Public charity
Maimonides Medical Center
MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER is dedicated to fostering healthy communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $154,520 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,242,063 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,087,543 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $126k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NIA COMMUNITY SERVICES NETWORK | $20,000 |
| BAY RIDGE CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| PAKISTANI AMERICAN MERCHANT ASSOC | $15,000 |
| BEIT EL-MAQDIS ISLAMIC CENTER | $14,800 |
| UNITED HOSPITAL FUND | $12,500 |
| CAIPA FOUNDATION INC | $12,120 |
| ARTHUR ASHE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN HEALTH | $12,000 |
| GUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC | $10,000 |
| HEARTSHARE HUMAN SERVICES OF NEW YORK | $10,000 |
| BANGLADESHI AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP SOCIETY | $7,500 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF MARINE PARK | $7,500 |
| 1199SEIU EMPLOYER CHILD CARE CORP | $7,100 |
| THE GILBERT RIVERA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $251k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FVFLATBUSH VOLUNTEERS OF HATZOLOH INC4× · 2017–2021 · $355k · revenue +226%
- BPBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH4× · 2017–2021 · $348k · revenue +28%
- CFCAIPA FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- HIHATZOLOH INCORPORATED DBA CHEVRA HATZALAHgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $71k · revenue +97%
- SCSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $26k · revenue +57%
- COCOUNCIL OF JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS OF FLATBUSH INCone grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…
Providing enhanced quality of life to the residents of the community particularly the elderly and also offering services, support, and connections to resources so that residents can stay safely in their communities
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy
Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…
Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.
The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…
To provide hospice services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis
We provide greater access to high quality medical care and keep our communities healthy through an integrated care system that respects the diversity of our communities and addresses both the health needs and unique factors that shape them.
Metropolitan ny coordinating council is a not-for-profit organization which serves as a primary advocate for the social welfare needs of the poor, near-poor and elderly in the metro ny area. the entity is dedicated to the alleviation of…
The objective and mission of the corporation shall be to ensure the availability of funding to support the development, expansion and delivery of the highest quality effective and efficient primary care services, coupled with additional…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Brooklyn Pride Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FLATBUSH VOLUNTEERS OF HATZOLOH INC ↗
- Who funds BOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds HATZOLOH INCORPORATED DBA CHEVRA HATZALAH ↗
- Who funds CAIPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC ↗
- Who funds 1199 SEIU EMPLOYER CHILD CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WILLIAMSBURG VOLUNTEERS OF HATZOLAH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds FUTURES IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NACHAS HEALTH & FAMILY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ARTHUR ASHE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Hatzolah of Mill BasinCanarsie Inc ↗
- Who funds BAY RIDGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BORO PARK JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ARAB AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN PRIDE INC ↗
- Who funds NIA COMMUNITY SERVICES NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Ezras Cholim Yad Ephraim Inc ↗
- Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
- Who funds The New York Community Hospital of Brooklyn Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVKAH LAUFER BIKUR CHOLIM ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK EHEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BANGLADESHI AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP SOCIETY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds ASE GLOBAL BRIDGES INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS OF FLATBUSH INC ↗
- Who funds NURSES HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK UNITED JEWISH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany Inc · The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Healthfirst Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maimonides Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.