· Public charity
Madruga Foundation Inc
To help ameliorate poverty, improve living conditions and provide aid to those who are in need of food, clothing and shelter and living in new york by providing such individuals with food, clothing, shelter, referrals to organizations that improve employment and provide housing opportunities, and to do any and all acts to provide…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NE'EMAN FOUNDATION USA | $25,000 |
| EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| INGERSOLL RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION INC | $14,805 |
| JUAN PABLO DUARTE FOUNDATION | $11,407 |
| LATINO YOUTH IN COMMUNICATION ARTS INC | $10,000 |
| BRONXWORKS | $5,427 |
| EAST SIDE HOUSE INC | $4,763 |
| FORDHAM BEDFORD HOUSING CORPORATION | $4,541 |
| BRONX COUNTY FAIRS AND EXPOSITION ASSOCIATION INC | $4,541 |
| SPECIAL ADULTS OF CONCOURSE VILLAGE | $3,655 |
| THE PUBLIC THEATER | $1,000 |
| WHOLESOME FAMILY NETWORK INC | $798 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +103% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMEUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +267%
- HRHARLEM RBI INC2× · 2020–2021 · $60k · revenue +84%
- FSFAMILY SUPPORT SYSTEMS UNLIMITED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATIO3× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +176%
Funded once
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW YORKone grant, 2020 · $44k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +67%
- NDNYC DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2021 · $19k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The company is involved in acquiring and managing residential dwelling units primarily in the south bronx, for low income families.
A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.
The organization coordinates the people, businesses and institutions of the bronx to develop shared wealth and ownership and supports low income people of color in the decision making process at every step. this network of stakeholders,is…
Fordham bedford community services inc. (fbcsi), was formed for the purpose of promoting the public good by assisting in and furthering the establishment and operation of one or more day care centers. in addition, fbcsi assists children…
Bronx parent housing network is committed to making a difference in solving the housing problem in new york city by transforming lives and creating holistic paths to employment so that individuals and families can secure safe, clean,…
Nhn promotes racial justice while empowering low and moderate-income new yorkers to fight for, secure and maintain quality housing and build financial assets. nhn is a hud-certfied counseling agency based in brooklyn, new york.
The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…
The organization is dedicated to combining education and advocacy to expand opportunities for children and families in order to strengthen the voice of the latino community based on the belief that the most effective way to support latino…
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
As a community center, bronx house offers dynamic educational, health, recreational and cultural programs that are enriching and meaningful.guided by our jewish communal values and traditions, bonx house welcomes all people to engage in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Manhattan Improvement Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Latino Youth in Communication Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARLEM RBI INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT SYSTEMS UNLIMITED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATIO ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE BUILDERS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Bronx Overall Economic Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds JUAN PABLO DUARTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LATINO YOUTH IN COMMUNICATION ARTS ↗
- Who funds BRONX SPREADING LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds BRONX COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ONE COMMUNITY NYC INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Fordham Bedford Housing Corporation ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New York Yankees Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Hispanic Federation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Madruga Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.