Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
INWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC (New York) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $10,419 in grants to it, the largest being MADRUGA FOUNDATION INC ($10,419). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
INWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC is better cushioned than half of the 1,593 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,593 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
68% of INWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $0 → $10k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of INWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 2 funders by total. Association, not causation.
INWOOD COMMUNITY SERVICES INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from New York funders.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $3.2M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
91% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing