Skip to content

· Public charity

Madala

Enable the National Christian Foundation to strengthen the Christian Church and ministries in West Africa.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$11MReligion$2.5MEmployment$318kHuman Services$277kEducation$153kCommunity Improvement$50kPhilanthropy$15k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $2,393,239, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,176,646 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $783,407 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $514k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
$65,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$201k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cure International$1,515,000
SIM$291,064
GEM for Niger$115,000
Hope Walks$90,000
Edify$80,000
EMI$65,500
Helping Hands Ministries$63,240
Tech Serve Intl Inc$50,125
PAACS$50,000
Christian World Outreach$48,260
Prison Fellowship International$20,000
RUN International$5,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Global Eye Mission: $70k → 11%Helping Hands Ministries: $140k → 13%Helping Hands Ministries: $74k → 13%Helping Hands Ministries: $63k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
MA
SD
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
AR
TN
NC
OK
AL
GA
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $625k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$625k · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: evanglism · education · healthcare

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 21 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$14M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+32%

Still filing today

76%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionEmploymentEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CURE INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.2M · revenue +4%
  • HW
    HOPE WALKS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $568k · revenue +42%
  • E
    Edify
    4× · 2020–2024 · $420k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • GE
    GLOBAL EYE MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +32% · 63% of their budget
  • CA
    CROSSROADS AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCH BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $65k
  • HI
    HOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Christian Ministries International
—
3
Joshua Nations International

Spreading christianity worldwide.

Religion
4
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
5
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
6
Christian Outreach for Africa

To promote the gospel of jesus christ by developing u.s. collaborative support for african christian outreach ministries, including education, job creation, health initiatives and acts of mercy.

Education
7
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
8
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
9
International Training and Equipping Ministries

Training the untrained church leaders in africa in order to deepen the church and to advance the gospel of christ through vibrant, healthy churches.

Religion
10
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
11
Vision Africa Ministries Inc

Vision africa is a god centetred ministry and mission organization whose purpose is to share gods love with the african people empowering africans to develop, staff, and manage life-saving, life changing

Religion
12
Commission to Every Nation

To advance the gospel of jesus christ to every nation through pastoral care and missionary support.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chalmers Center for Economic Development; the most unlike its peers is Prison Fellowship International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
20/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,211,740 · InternationalCURE INTERNATIONAL INCHOPE WALKS INC: $567,500 · InternationalEdify: $420,000 · International+5 more: $667,112 · International+5 moreSIM USA INCORPORATED: $1,582,607 · OtherSIM USA INCORPOR…INSTITUTE FOR THE PROMOTION OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT I: $117,040 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR TH…OASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD NFP: $81,200 · Other+12 more: $310,241 · Other+12 moreEFFECTIVE MINISTRIES INC: $281,525 · ReligionDevelopment Assoc International: $141,450 · Religion+1 more: $3,992 · ReligionHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $277,123 · Human ServicesGLOBAL EYE MISSION: $70,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH: $292,910 · EmploymentHOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC: $25,000 · EmploymentORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $55,409 · EducationJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $54,692 · EducationVISION OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $57,000 · Health
International$10,866,352Other$2,091,088Religion$426,967Human Services$347,123Employment$317,910Education$110,101Health$57,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $9,211,740 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetHOPE WALKS INC: $567,500 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetEdify: $420,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH: $292,910 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetGRACE EDUCATION MINISTRIES FOR NIGER: $283,640 over 6y, 17% of budgetEFFECTIVE MINISTRIES INC: $281,525 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetHELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $277,123 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETY: $250,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDevelopment Assoc International: $141,450 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $96,972 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetOASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD NFP: $81,200 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetGLOBAL EYE MISSION: $70,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetVISION OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $57,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY: $55,409 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $54,692 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTECH SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,125 over 1y, 12% of budgetHOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetREACHING UNREACHED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL: $16,500 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCAMEROON HEALTH AND EDUCATION FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetSOAR GLOBAL INC: $3,992 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,010 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WALKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Edify ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WORLD OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds GRACE EDUCATION MINISTRIES FOR NIGER ↗
  • Who funds EFFECTIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Development Assoc International ↗
  • Who funds CHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds OASIS INTERNATIONAL LTD NFP ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL EYE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds VISION OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TECH SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC ↗
  • Who funds REMEMBER NIGER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds REACHING UNREACHED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CAMEROON HEALTH AND EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOAR GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tyndale House MinistriesIL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tyndale House Ministries · Servant Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · First Fruit Inc · Gordon Christian Trust · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · G II Charities · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Madala funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madala. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oral Roberts University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Madala?

Find your warmest path to Madala through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Madala’s filings →

More from the funding graph