Skip to content

· Private foundation

Macton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$264kArts & Culture$237kEnvironment$159kHealth$105kHuman Services$90kReligion$23kYouth Development$9kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$30k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MATTHEWS MUSIC GUILD$25,000
DESCANSO GARDENS$20,000
MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL$15,000
LES AMIES$10,000
MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL$5,000
ST MATTHEW'S PARISH$2,500
NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,000
LANDON SCHOOL$1,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$500
HEAL THE BAY$500
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE FUND$500
KCRW$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $91k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%LES AMIES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$873k · 30 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
2

Total granted

$873k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+489%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +32%
  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS MUSIC GUILD
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +54%
  • LA
    LES AMIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • DC
    DA CAMERA SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CONCERNgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +489%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
3
Los Angeles County Medical Association

To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.

—
4
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
6
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
7
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
8
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
9
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
10
Occidental College

See schedule othe mission of occidental college is to provide a gifted and diverse group of students with a total educational experience of the highest quality - one that prepares them for leadership in an increasingly complex,…

Education
11
The Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra Society Inc

The orchestra pursues its mission, "to enrich and connect our community through intimate and transformative musical experiences which exemplify and foster artistic excellence, education and innovation," through the blend of traditional…

Arts & Culture
12
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The People Concern. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DESCANSO GARDENS: $125,000 · OtherDESCANSO GARDENSUCLA MEDICAL CENTER: $80,000 · OtherUCLA MEDICAL CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST MATTHEW'S PARISH: $17,500 · OtherLAS MADRINAS: $17,000 · Other+12 more: $37,250 · Other+12 moreMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $185,000 · EducationMARLBOROUGH SCHOOLTeach for America Inc: $30,000 · EducationTeach for America IncHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $30,000 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOLLANDON SCHOOL: $9,000 · Education+3 more: $9,500 · EducationST MATTHEWS MUSIC GUILD: $165,000 · ReligionST MATTHEWS MUSIC GUI…LES AMIES INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesLES AMIES I…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesSustainable Conservation: $20,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAY: $4,500 · EnvironmentLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ART CLUB: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $1,000 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES INC: $2,000 · Community ImprovementSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Health
Other$331,750Education$263,500Religion$165,000Human Services$91,000Environment$24,500Arts & Culture$10,000Community Improvement$2,000Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL: $185,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST MATTHEWS MUSIC GUILD: $165,000 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetLES AMIES INC: $90,000 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSustainable Conservation: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAS MADRINAS: $17,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS PARK CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA ART CLUB: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOCE-TV FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS MUSIC GUILD ↗
  • Who funds LES AMIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Conservation ↗
  • Who funds LAS MADRINAS ↗
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ART CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds KOCE-TV FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Steaven K and Judith G Jones Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Macton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Macton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Macton’s filings →

    More from the funding graph