· Public charity
Israel on Campus Coalition Inc
To inspire american college campus communities, students, thought-leaders, and other communities grappling with antisemitism to see israel as a source of pride and to empower them to stand up for israel both off and on campus; the corporation will accomplish its work both off and on campuses across the united states, and will advance…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $282,920 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $655,258 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $372,338 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $92k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $191k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $42,506 |
| THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $28,000 |
| NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA | $25,000 |
| HILLEL AT BARUCH COLLEGE | $15,300 |
| HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC | $12,900 |
| GRATZ COLLEGE | $12,500 |
| CHABAD OF THE NORTH SHORE | $10,000 |
| CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| TAMID NATIONAL | $10,000 |
| TRAUMA INFORMED LOS ANGELES | $9,000 |
| FEATURE GROUP INC | $8,500 |
| RELIGION MEDIA FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| HILLEL AT STONY BROOK | $6,550 |
| ACADEMIC STUDIES PRESS INC | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 26% of Israel on Campus Coalition Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 6% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 2% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTD2× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +13%
- TLThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc2× · 2021–2022 · $152k · revenue +940%
- HAHILLEL AT BARUCH INC8× · 2018–2025 · $108k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- NCNETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTEone grant, 2022 · $335k · revenue +23%
- IEISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCEone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +17%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAone grant, 2022 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enrich the lives of Jewish students so that they may enrich the Jewish people and the world.
Hillel of Colorado seeks to engage, empower, and work with Jewish college students to create Jewish communities at University of Denver, Colorado State University, Auraria Campus, Colorado School of Mines and other front range…
The mission of uri hillel is to enrich the lives of jewish students at the university of rhode island so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.
Hillel at Miami University, the center of Jewish life on campus, seeks to engage, connect, and empower students to explore their Jewish identity creating a vibrant Jewish community and inspiring the next generation of Jewish leaders.
The mission of hillel at washington university in st louis is to be a catalyst for jewish life among college students in st louis. we connect students with one another and with jewish culture and traditions through service and social…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Enriching the lives of jewish students so that they may enrich the jewish people & the world hillel students leaders, professional & lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming & inclusive environment for jewish college…
The mission of Iowa Hillel is to enhance the lives of Jewish students at the University of Iowa, so they may enrich the Jewish people and the world. Iowa Hillel envisions a world for our students where they find a community here at Iowa…
Enrich the lives of jewish students
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…
KU Hillel's mission is to connect Jewish students to each other and to their Judaism, to inspire and equip the next generation of Jewish leaders, and to build a thriving Jewish community on campus.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Southern California Hillel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Trauma Informed La. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TAMID ISRAEL INVESTMENT GROUP LTD ↗
- Who funds NETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLEL AT BARUCH INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds CHABAD ON CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HILLEL ↗
- Who funds THE BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds BNAI BRITH HILLEL FOUNDATION AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
- Who funds CORNELL HILLEL ↗
- Who funds Hillel at Binghamton Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
- Who funds GRATZ COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds Jewish Heritage Programs ↗
- Who funds M54 INC ↗
- Who funds GAINESVILLE JEWISH STUDENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maccabee Task Force Foundation · Chabad on Campus International Inc · Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Seed the Dream Foundation · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Birthright Israel Foundation · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Israel on Campus Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.