Skip to content

· Private foundation

M Night Shyamalan Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$740kInternational$564kReligion$149kArts & Culture$116kYouth Development$105kHealth$60kCrime & Legal$43kEnvironment$29kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ONE LIFE TO LOVE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
THE SMALL WORLD$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 67% of grant dollars ($1.6M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 33% that went abroad ($759k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PATHFINDERS JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10k → 17%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 33% of all-years giving ($759k)

8 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Uganda$217k · 7 grants
India$154k · 6 grants
Kenya$150k · 8 grants
Indonesia$65k · 3 grants
Sri Lanka$60k · 3 grants
Madagascar$58k · 3 grants
Ghana$30k · 1 grant
Nepal$25k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 14 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$2.1M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+214%
+339%

Still filing today

43%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $354k · revenue +66%
  • JP
    JOUNCE PARTNERS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $268k · revenue +173%
  • 1P
    12 PLUS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $265k · revenue +232%

Funded once

  • YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $43k · revenue +26%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • M
    MSEMVS
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International Student Exchange Programs

Isep empowers higher education institutions to expand the perspectives and potential of students around the world through our wide range of accessible, authentic academic intercultural programs.

International
2
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
3
Questscope Ltd

To improve the quality of life in marginalized communities.

International
4
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
5
Onechild Global

One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.

International
6
Girls Education Collaborative Inc

GEC partners with locally-led organizations to catalyze and support sustainable, community-driven solutions that remove social, economic, and gender-based barriers keeping girls out of school in under-resourced regions of the global south.

International
7
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
8
The Just Trust for Education

Accelerate momentum for justice reform and public safety innovation in every corner of the country. the just trust for education works to create stronger, more resilient state and national advocacy and public education ecosystems that can…

Crime & Legal
9
Yes Every Kid Inc

yes. every kid. is a leading advocacy team with a families-first approach to transform America's education policy landscape.

—
10
Project Zawadi Inc

To ensure tanzanian children and youth have access to a quality education.

Education
11
Education Across Borders

Eab works in partnership with marginalized communities in the dominican republic to co-create lasting solutions to extreme poverty, through educational, community development and service learning prog.

Education
12
Schools for Salone

Advancing quality education in sierra leone through local partnerships.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springboard Collaborative; the most unlike its peers is One Life to Love a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $216,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARDADA PARDADI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY: $129,000 · OtherPARDADA PARDADI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $116,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $82,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEA LEAF TRUST: $60,000 · OtherTEA LEAF TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherSLUMS GOING GREEN AND CLEAN: $29,000 · Other+6 more: $95,600 · Other+6 moreSYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCE: $354,190 · InternationalSYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCEAFRICAN EDUCATION PROGRAM: $185,000 · InternationalAFRICAN EDUCATION PROGRAMONE LIFE TO LOVE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $25,000 · International12 PLUS: $265,000 · Education12 PLUSEducation Bridge: $205,000 · EducationEducation BridgeJOUNCE PARTNERS INC: $267,600 · Youth DevelopmentJOUNCE PARTNE…BEYOND THE BARS INC: $105,000 · Crime & LegalYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $43,000 · Crime & LegalPATHFINDERS JUSTICE INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $2,850 · Human Services
Other$861,000International$564,190Education$470,000Youth Development$267,600Crime & Legal$148,000Human Services$12,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCE: $354,190 over 8y, 25% of budgetJOUNCE PARTNERS INC: $267,600 over 7y, 4.0% of budget12 PLUS: $265,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetEducation Bridge: $205,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetAFRICAN EDUCATION PROGRAM: $185,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetBEYOND THE BARS INC: $105,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetYOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC: $43,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetONE LIFE TO LOVE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetPATHFINDERS JUSTICE INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetMAZZONI CENTER: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SYRIAN EMERGENCY TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds JOUNCE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds 12 PLUS ↗
  • Who funds Education Bridge ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN EDUCATION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE LIFE TO LOVE A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PATHFINDERS JUSTICE INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MAZZONI CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and GirlsPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M Night Shyamalan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M Night Shyamalan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to M Night Shyamalan Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to M Night Shyamalan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on M Night Shyamalan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph