Skip to content
M & L B Leibowitz Charitable Trust 031844-001 at a glance

· Private foundation

M & L B Leibowitz Charitable Trust 031844-001

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$175kEducation$174kReligion$83kCrime & Legal$42kFood & Nutrition$19kPhilanthropy$12kAnimals$11kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $63k
$6,588
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULANE UNIVERSITY$13,088
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$10,000
STAND UP TO CANCER$10,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION$10,000
LARCHMONT CHARTER SCHOOL$8,000
USC GOULD SCHOOL OF LAW$6,588
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD$5,000
TEMPLE SINAI$5,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$5,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$3,000
CAST WATER SAFETY FOUNDATION$3,000
STAND TALL INTERNATIONAL$1,500
START RESCUE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%GROSSMAN BURN FOUNDATION: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CA
MO
DE
DC
LA
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$472k · 17 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$472k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+18%

Still filing today

71%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $72k · revenue +44%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +13%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $49k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • TS
    Temple Sinai
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • US
    USC SCHOOL OF LAW - DEAN'S DISCRETIONARY FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
6
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
9
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
12
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cast Water Safety Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $72,088 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUC…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $49,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYLARCHMONT SCHOOLS: $39,449 · EducationLARCHMONT SCHOOLSGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL: $13,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOLUSC GOULD SCHOOL OF LAW: $33,588 · OtherUSC GOULD SCHOOL OF LAWCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM INC: $25,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM INCTEMPLE SINAI: $25,000 · OtherTEMPLE SINAITEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD: $22,500 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOODLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $13,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKTemple Sinai: $10,000 · OtherTemple SinaiAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYUSC SCHOOL OF LAW - DEAN'S DISCRETIONARY FUND: $8,500 · OtherUSC SCHOOL OF LAW - DEAN'S DISCR…+1 more: $5,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $54,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIET…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $6,571 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTIT…+2 more: $4,378 · HealthCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $48,805 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH …+1 more: $750 · Human ServicesCAST WATER SAFETY FOUNDATION: $12,000 · PhilanthropySTAND UP TO CANCER: $10,000 · PhilanthropySHELTER TRANSPORT ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $7,500 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $3,470 · AnimalsStand Tall International: $6,750 · InternationalFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Education$173,537Other$153,088Health$104,949Human Services$49,555Philanthropy$22,000Animals$10,970International$6,750Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $72,088 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $54,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $49,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $48,805 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLARCHMONT SCHOOLS: $39,449 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN DAY SCHOOL: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAST WATER SAFETY FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSTAND UP TO CANCER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER TRANSPORT ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $7,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $6,571 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN FILM & VIDEO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $3,470 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,378 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrossman Burn Foundation: $750 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M & L B Leibowitz Charitable Trust 031844-001 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M & L B Leibowitz Charitable Trust 031844-001. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on M & L B Leibowitz Charitable Trust 031844-001’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home