Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lu Wang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$174kPhilanthropy$28kArts & Culture$27kHealth$23kHousing & Shelter$7kInternational$6kEnvironment$5kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$830k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KQED$7,500
PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION$5,000
LIFEMOVES$2,000
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$1,500
SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
CHI AM CIRCLE CLUB$1,000
THE HARKER SCHOOL$1,000
CHINESE HISTORICAL CULTURAL PROJECT$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLO$300
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$300
NATIONAL TRUST HISTORIC PRESERVATIO$300
HARVARD COLLEGE$300
ELKHORN SLOUGH FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $700) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INNOCENT PROJECT: $200 → 17%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
DC
OK
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 20 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
21

Total granted

$112k
$164k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+75%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +25%
  • KI
    KQED INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +17%
  • CA
    Chi Am Circle Club
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • AK
    ABERCROMBIE KENT PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • A
    ALLSF
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
4
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
10
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
11
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifemoves; the most unlike its peers is Chi Am Circle Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISPAMF: $15,750 · OtherPAMF+27 more: $38,690 · Other+27 moreChi Am Circle Club: $10,400 · EducationTHE HARKER SCHOOL: $7,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,950 · Education+4 more: $2,000 · EducationSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $20,250 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $800 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthKQED INC: $17,601 · Arts & CultureCHINESE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PROJECT: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,100 · International+1 more: $100 · InternationalMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $4,000 · AnimalsBAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyElkhorn Slough Foundation: $850 · Philanthropy
Other$204,440Education$21,350Health$21,300Arts & Culture$21,101International$6,200Animals$4,000Philanthropy$1,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $20,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $17,601 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChi Am Circle Club: $10,400 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE HARKER SCHOOL: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAngel Island Immigration Station Foundation: $5,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PROJECT: $3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElkhorn Slough Foundation: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds Chi Am Circle Club ↗
  • Who funds THE HARKER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Angel Island Immigration Station Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA LYME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Elkhorn Slough Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STANFORD HEALTH CARE ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lu Wang Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lu Wang Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lu Wang Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph