Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ltm Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$615k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$828kEducation$335kFood & Nutrition$333kEnvironment$301kArts & Culture$221kAnimals$190kYouth Development$63kHuman Services$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $205k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $400k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCE$200,000
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ROME$100,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$50,000
HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY$50,000
MINISTRY OF AWE$25,000
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$25,000
PHILABUNDANCE$25,000
HEIGHTS OF PHILADELPHIA$15,000
ACHIEVABILITY$15,000
BROAD STREET LOVE$15,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$15,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$10,000
FELLOW MORTALS$10,000
MORE THAN WORDS$10,000
DISCOVERY MUSEUM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROAD STREET LOVE: $15k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $15k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $15k → 22%BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $15k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
VA
AZ
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 19 repeat orgs$453k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
18

Total granted

$1.9M
$423k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+34%

Still filing today

89%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationEnvironmentScience & TechFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $360k · revenue +7%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ROME
    3× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue +94%
  • Philabundance
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +33%
  • NC
    NATURE CONSERVANCY-COVE MOMTAIN
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • AO
    AVENUE OF THE ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
9
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
10
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
11
Alliance for Sustainable Energy Llc

The mission of the alliance for sustainable energy llc (alliance) is to operate the u.s. department of energy's national renewable energy laboratory to advance the science and engineering of energy efficiency, sustainable transportation,…

Science & Tech
12
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone Forever; the most unlike its peers is The Lenfest Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
22/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCE: $430,000 · OtherACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCETHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYCarnegie Mellon University: $100,000 · OtherCarnegie Mellon UniversityGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $90,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCNATURE CONSERVANCY-COVE MOMTAIN: $75,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY-COVE MOMTAINMORE THAN WORDS INC: $62,500 · OtherMORE THAN WORDS INCFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $52,500 · Other+17 more: $226,000 · Other+17 moreTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $360,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTEAVENUE OF THE ARTS INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureAVENUE OF THE ARTS INCFRINGEARTS: $50,000 · Arts & CultureFRINGEARTSDISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $45,500 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY MUSEUM INCCAROUSEL SOCIETY OF THE NIAGARA FRONTIER INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ROME: $175,000 · EducationTHE AMERICAN …HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $60,000 · EducationHEIGHTS PHILA…YOUTH FARM PROJECT INC: $45,000 · EducationYOUTH FARM PR…NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $10,000 · EducationHAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION: $120,000 · AnimalsHAWK MOUNTA…FELLOW MORTALS INC: $65,000 · AnimalsFELLOW MORT…CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $58,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR …+1 more: $5,000 · AnimalsPhilabundance: $140,000 · Food & NutritionBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $60,000 · Human ServicesACHIEVEABILITY: $45,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,136,000Arts & Culture$560,500Education$290,000Animals$248,000Food & Nutrition$140,000Human Services$60,000Housing & Shelter$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $360,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ROME: $175,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPhilabundance: $140,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION: $120,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAVENUE OF THE ARTS INC: $75,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetFELLOW MORTALS INC: $65,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC: $62,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $60,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $58,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $52,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRINGEARTS: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $45,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetACHIEVEABILITY: $45,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetYOUTH FARM PROJECT INC: $45,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetTHE LENFEST FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetCYCLE CONNECT INC: $30,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA: $27,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAROUSEL SOCIETY OF THE NIAGARA FRONTIER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ROME ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds HAWK MOUNTAIN SANCTUARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds AVENUE OF THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOW MORTALS INC ↗
  • Who funds MORE THAN WORDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds BROAD STREET MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FRINGEARTS ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVEABILITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FARM PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LENFEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CYCLE CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CAROUSEL SOCIETY OF THE NIAGARA FRONTIER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Alaska Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA GEOGRAPHIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds POLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ltm Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ltm Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • More Than Words Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • Discovery Museum Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ltm Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph