Skip to content
Loveloud Foundation % Tribeca Business Mgmt at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Loveloud Foundation % Tribeca Business Mgmt

To ignite the vital conversation about what it means to love, understand and accept and support our lgbtq+ friends and family.

$271k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Civil Rights$1.0MYouth Development$612kHuman Services$370kPhilanthropy$350kHealth$109kPublic Benefit$25kEducation$5k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $233,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $270,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,650 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $188k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$534k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENCIRLE FAMILY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER$188,250
MAMA DRAGONS$25,000
EQUALITY TEXAS FOUNDATION (EQTX)$10,000
ALI FORNEY CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $972k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FUSION YOU INC: $10k → 11%OPEN BOOKS: $10k → 14%ENCIRCLE FAMILY & YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $350k → 8%ENCIRLE FAMILY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $188k → 8%ENCIRLE FAMILY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $188k → 8%ENCIRLE FAMILY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $150k → 8%ENCIRLE FAMILY YOUTH RESOURCE CENTER: $75k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NV
IN
NJ
CA
UT
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 19 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$2.1M
$435k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+70%

Still filing today

84%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24
Civil RightsHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center
    5× · 2019–2024 · $952k · revenue +42%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $350k · revenue +318%
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $90k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TEGAN AND SARA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $350k · revenue -80% · 61% of their budget
  • FT
    Flourish Therapy Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +111%
  • YE
    YOUNG EQUAL
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Museum of Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender History & Culture

Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people

—
2
Outfront Minnesota

Outfront's mission is to create a state where lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (lgbtq) people are free to be who they are, love who they love, and live without fear of violence, harassment or discrimination. in our effort to…

Civil Rights
3
Interpride

To contribute to the visibility and inclusion of diverse sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, and sex characteristics (sogiesc) communities. to connect, grow, and support pride platforms and networks globally. to assist…

Education
4
American Association of Physicians for Human Right

Glma is a national organization committed to ensuring health equity for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (lgbtq) and all sexual and gender minority (sgm) individuals, and equality for lgbtq/sgm health professionals in their work…

Civil Rights
5
Global Philanthropy Project Inc

Global Philanthropy Project (GPP or the Organization) is a collaboration of funders and philanthropic advisors working to expand global philanthropic support to advance the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex…

Philanthropy
6
Equality Utah Foundation

To secure equal rights and protections for lgbtq utahns and their families.

Civil Rights
7
The Alliance for Lgbtq Youth Inc

The Alliance for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Youth provides mental health and care coordination services, leadership development, and policy advocacy that centers the lives and experiences of LGBTQ youth in…

Human Services
8
National Trans Bar Association
Education
9
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
10
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
11
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
12
Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund Inc

Lambda legal defense and education fund, inc. is a national organization committed to achieving full recognition of the civil rights of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender people, and anyone living with hiv through impact litigation,…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Rainbow Utah; the most unlike its peers is Open Books. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center: $951,500 · Human ServicesEncircle Family and Youth Resource CenterUtah Pride Center Inc: $59,750 · Human ServicesUtah Pride Center Inc+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesTREVOR PROJECT INC: $350,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INCEQUALITY UTAH: $102,500 · Civil RightsEQUALITY UTAHMAMA DRAGONS: $90,500 · Civil RightsMAMA DRAGONSHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $90,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INCGender Spectrum Charitable Fund: $29,500 · Civil Rights+4 more: $50,000 · Civil Rights+4 moreTHE TEGAN AND SARA FOUNDATION: $350,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TEGAN AND S…GLAAD INC: $106,000 · OtherGLAAD INCPROJECT CONTRAST CORP: $37,500 · OtherPROJECT C…OGDEN PRIDE: $15,500 · OtherOGDEN PRI…YOUNG EQUAL: $15,000 · OtherYOUNG EQU…PFLAG: $13,500 · OtherPFLAGSAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $7,500 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherUtah Aids Foundation: $56,000 · HealthGenderbands: $45,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $22,500 · HealthHITOPS INC: $15,000 · HealthFlourish Therapy Inc: $15,000 · HealthTHE OUT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterAffirmation LGBTQ Mormons Families & Fri: $8,500 · Religion
Human Services$1,031,250Civil Rights$712,500Philanthropy$350,000Other$215,000Health$153,500Public Benefit$25,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Religion$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEncircle Family and Youth Resource Center: $951,500 over 5y, 20% of budgetTHE TEGAN AND SARA FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $350,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGLAAD INC: $106,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEQUALITY UTAH: $102,500 over 3y, 22% of budgetMAMA DRAGONS: $90,500 over 4y, 17% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUtah Pride Center Inc: $59,750 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUtah Aids Foundation: $56,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGenderbands: $45,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetGender Spectrum Charitable Fund: $29,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE OUT FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHITOPS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFlourish Therapy Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGLSEN INC: $14,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPFLAG: $13,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFUSION YOU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQTX Equality Texas Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPEN BOOKS: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetAffirmation LGBTQ Mormons Families & Fri: $8,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPROJECT RAINBOW UTAH: $7,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

B W Bastian FoundationDominion Energy Chari…The Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for Good
B W Bastian FoundationUT17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: B W Bastian Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Loveloud Foundation % Tribeca Business Mgmt funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Loveloud Foundation % Tribeca Business Mgmt. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Loveloud Foundation % Tribeca Business Mgmt?

    Find your warmest path to Loveloud Foundation % Tribeca Business Mgmt through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Loveloud Foundation % Tribeca Business Mgmt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home