Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Louis L Borick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
77
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$6.7MHuman Services$5.6MEducation$5.4MEnvironment$2.5MHealth$2.3MRecreation & Sports$1.4MInternational$1.4MAnimals$916kOther$0
02FY2025 · 77 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k56 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.7M
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$62M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Youth Homes Inc$200,000
DIFFADALLAS$175,000
PEF Israel Endowment Fund Inc$125,000
Resource Center$110,000
Point Foundation$100,000
Bay Ed Fund$100,000
I AM a Golfer Foundation$100,000
Watson's Children's Shelter$100,000
CENTER FOR THE EDUCATION OF INFANT DEAF$100,000
Clark Fork Coalition$75,000
Montana Natural History Center$75,000
Tipping Point Community$75,000
Wild Montana$60,000
Los Angeles County Department of Arts and Culture$50,000
Springboard Collaborative$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Watson's Children's Shelter: $150k → 9%Watson's Children's Shelter: $125k → 9%Dallas Children's Advocacy Center: $50k → 14%Watson's Children's Shelter: $125k → 9%Watson's Children's Shelter: $100k → 9%Watson's Children's Shelter: $100k → 9%Watson's Children's Shelter: $100k → 9%Watson's Children's Shelter: $100k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $75k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $75k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $50k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $50k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $50k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $30k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $30k → 9%Mountain Home Montana: $30k → 9%Families First: $40k → 9%Families First: $40k → 9%Child Care Resources: $30k → 9%Child Care Resources: $30k → 9%Beyond Emancipation: $30k → 10%Beyond Emancipation: $30k → 10%First Place for Youth: $50k → 10%First Place for Youth: $50k → 10%First Place for Youth: $50k → 10%First Place for Youth: $50k → 10%First Place for Youth: $50k → 10%First Place for Youth: $45k → 10%First Place for Youth: $45k → 10%Children Now: $40k → 10%Children Now: $40k → 10%First Place for Youth: $40k → 10%Children Now: $40k → 10%Children Now: $35k → 10%Children Now: $30k → 10%Children Now: $30k → 10%Children Now: $30k → 10%Children Now: $30k → 10%Children Now: $30k → 10%Raise A Child Inc: $30k → 14%United Friends of the Children: $40k → 14%Raise A Child Inc: $30k → 14%United Friends of the Children: $40k → 14%United Friends of the Children: $30k → 14%United Friends of the Children: $30k → 14%Fostering Media Connections: $30k → 14%Foothill Family Service: $35k → 14%Foothill Family Service: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
NY
MA
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
SC
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$29M · 130 repeat orgs$855k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

130 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

130
29

Total granted

$29M
$630k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+7%

Still filing today

68%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YH
    YOUTH HOMES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +11%
  • IA
    I Am A Golfer Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +3% · 42% of their budget
  • WESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • GC
    GARDEN CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -6%
  • CS
    Colorado State University Found
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • AH
    AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Conservancy

The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.

Arts & Culture
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
4
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
7
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

10
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
11
Chico Children's Museum

None

Education
12
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsCancer Support ServicesDance Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Elementary Literacy TutoringPolicy Research and AdvocacySenior Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/136
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,429

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/124
Grantees still filing
91/124
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DIFFADALLAS — $1,529,500 · OtherDIFFADALLASI Am A Golfer Foundation — $1,275,000 · OtherI Am A Golfer FoundationWESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,005,000 · OtherWESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCenter for the Education of Infant Deaf — $830,000 · OtherCenter for the Education of Infant DeafRESOURCE CENTER — $560,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $490,000 · Other+80 more — $8,619,175 · Other+80 moreYOUTH HOMES — $1,875,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HOMESWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC — $800,000 · Human ServicesWATSON CHILDREN'S SH…MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC — $415,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN HOME MONTAN…FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $380,000 · Human ServicesFIRST PLACE FOR YOUT…CHILDREN NOW — $307,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOWFoothill Family Service — $245,000 · Human ServicesALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION — $195,000 · Human Services+11 more — $1,367,000 · Human Services+11 moreTeach for America Inc — $575,000 · EducationTeach for A…POINT FOUNDATION — $495,000 · EducationPOINT FOUND…READING PARTNERS — $420,000 · EducationREADING PAR…THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION — $366,430 · EducationTHE UNIVERS…EVERYBODY DANCE LA — $195,000 · EducationEVERYBODY D…WRITING COACHES OF MONTANA — $185,000 · EducationWRITING COA…FAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER — $165,000 · EducationFAMILIES FO…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationOUT TEACH — $125,000 · EducationThe Brookwood Community Inc — $125,000 · Education+8 more — $250,000 · Education+8 moreSWC MUSEUM CORP — $525,000 · Arts & CultureSWC MUSEUM…THE GARRY MARSHALL THEATRE — $260,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GARRY …East Bay Center for the Performing Arts — $240,000 · Arts & CultureEast Bay C…CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $160,000 · Arts & CultureCORPORATIO…Palm Springs Preservation Foundation — $155,000 · Arts & CulturePalm Sprin…DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $150,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYM…PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE — $145,000 · Arts & CulturePEROT MUSE…Arts for LA — $142,500 · Arts & CultureGreater Dallas Youth Orchestra Inc — $140,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $135,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more — $659,000 · Arts & Culture+16 moreCLARK FORK COALITION — $590,000 · EnvironmentCLARK FOR…MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER — $485,000 · EnvironmentMONTANA N…VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION — $470,000 · EnvironmentVIDA VERD…MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION — $205,000 · EnvironmentMONTANA W…HOME RESOURCE INC — $195,000 · EnvironmentHOME RESO…Bitterrooters For Planning — $150,000 · EnvironmentBitterroo…Anza-Borrego Desert Natural History Asso — $112,000 · EnvironmentBITTER ROOT LAND TRUST — $105,000 · Environment+4 more — $127,500 · EnvironmentTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $675,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $590,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $137,600 · Philanthropy+5 more — $95,000 · PhilanthropyMEN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $430,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $190,000 · HealthTHE MENNINGER CLINIC — $165,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN — $90,000 · HealthRETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST — $55,000 · HealthBRIGHTER BEGINNINGS — $50,000 · Health+2 more — $40,000 · Health
Other$14,308,675Human Services$5,584,500Education$3,051,430Arts & Culture$2,711,500Environment$2,439,500Philanthropy$1,497,600Health$1,020,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUTH HOMES — $1,875,000 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetI Am A Golfer Foundation — $1,275,000 over 5y, 42% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,005,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetWATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC — $800,000 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $675,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCLARK FORK COALITION — $590,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $590,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $575,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSWC MUSEUM CORP — $525,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION — $495,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $490,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetMONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER — $485,000 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetVIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION — $470,000 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetMEN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $430,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $420,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC — $415,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $380,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION — $366,430 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCENTERLINK INC — $325,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetMONTANA PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC — $315,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetCHILDREN NOW — $307,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetOpportunity Resources Inc — $294,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GARRY MARSHALL THEATRE — $260,000 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetDestiny Arts Center — $250,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetFoothill Family Service — $245,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts — $240,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetMONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION — $205,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEVERYBODY DANCE LA — $195,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetHOME RESOURCE INC — $195,000 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetALL FOR KIDS ORGANIZATION — $195,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $190,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS — $185,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWRITING COACHES OF MONTANA — $185,000 over 6y, 51% of budgetFOSTERALL — $180,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetPOLYPHONY FOUNDATION — $175,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC — $175,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD CARE RESOURCES — $172,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetRaise A Child Incorporated — $170,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $170,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $165,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER — $165,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetFOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS — $165,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC — $165,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS — $160,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOULA BUTTERFLY HOUSE AND INSECTARIUM — $160,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetPalm Springs Preservation Foundation — $155,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH HOMES
  • Who funds I Am A Golfer Foundation
  • Who funds WESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WATSON CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
  • Who funds CLARK FORK COALITION
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc
  • Who funds SWC MUSEUM CORP
  • Who funds POINT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER
  • Who funds VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION
  • Who funds MEN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CENTERLINK INC
  • Who funds MONTANA PRESERVATION ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN NOW
  • Who funds Opportunity Resources Inc
  • Who funds THE GARRY MARSHALL THEATRE
  • Who funds Destiny Arts Center
  • Who funds Foothill Family Service
  • Who funds East Bay Center for the Performing Arts
  • Who funds MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT32.4× affinity15 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Liatis Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · Missoula Community Foundation · Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Louis L Borick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Centerlink Inc12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 176 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph