How much did LOUIS J & MILLIE MATCEK KOCUREK CHARITABLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of LOUIS J & MILLIE MATCEK KOCUREK CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

citizensheritage

2021

citizensheritage

2022

point

2023

—

2024

czechque blueopera

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE SETTLEMENT HOME FOR CHILDREN$4,000
SHOOTIN FOR SCHOLARSHIPS INC$3,600
OBLATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$3,000
ST PIUS X CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,000
QUE FOR THE BLUE (QUE4BLUE)$1,800
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$1,500
SAN ANTONIO PHILHARMONIC$1,500
HILL COUNTRY PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$1,500
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY$1,500
DELL CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER$1,500
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$1,200
CENTER POINT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC$1,200
ST PIUS X CATHOLIC SCHOOL$1,000
10th LIFE SURGICAL CENTER$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$267k · 65 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

65 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$267k

$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+57%

Still filing today

38%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureAnimalsCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SD
SUMMER DREAMS INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +8%
SA
SAVING A HERO'S PLACE
3× · 2020–2022 · $8k · revenue +421%
AH
ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +71%

Funded once

AS
ASSUMPTION SEMINARY
one grant, 2023 · $2k
TA
TEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN
one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -13%
TL
TENTH LIFE SURGICAL CENTER
one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

San Antonio Regional Hospital

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of the people we serve.

Health

Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association

Recreation & Sports

The University of Texas Law School

Provide support to the University of Texas School of Law.

Education

San Antonio Christian School

Provide students pre-k to 12th a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith & service.

—

San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services

San Antonio Lighthouse for the Blind

San antonio lighthouse (vibrant works) provides vocational training and employment through the industrial division for individuals who are legally or totally blind

Human Services

Jewish Federation of San Antonio

The jewish federation of san antonio is the coordinating and convening body dedicated to building the jewish community, nurturing the quality of jewish life, and securing a favorable jewish future in san antonio, israel and worldwide…

Philanthropy

San Antonio Academy of Texas

The mission of san antonio academy of texas is to offer an exceptional education intentionally crafted for boys, ages, prekindergarten through eighth grade.

—

San Antonio Fighting Back Inc

Provide people with opportunities to create safe and healthy and caring communities by addressing the root causes and symptoms of drug-related crime, substance abuse, vicimization, and violence through combined efforts of communitiy…

Community Improvement

Humane Society of San Antonio

To protect and improve the lives of dogs and cats.

Animals

Southern Methodist University

The Primary mission of the university is education through research and teaching by creating and imparting knowledge that will shape citizens who contribute to their communities and lead professions in a global society.

Education

The McCombs School of Business

To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocates San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Manhattanville College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/42

the rest of the field

12%

1,046/8,510

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/34

Grantees still filing

26/34

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$216,700Education$30,600Arts & Culture$13,900Recreation & Sports$12,000Human Services$10,300Philanthropy$5,150Civil Rights$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX40.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable · Harvey E Najim Charitable · Cb and Anita Branch Trust · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable · Nathalie & Gladys Dalkowitz Charitable Trust · Keith M Orme and Pat Vigeon Orme · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · The Charity Ball Association Of · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation LOUIS J & MILLIE MATCEK KOCUREK CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SHOOTIN FOR SCHOLARSHIPS INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +55% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 831327410 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SHOOTIN FOR SCHOLARSHIPS INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Louis J & Millie Matcek Kocurek Charitable?

Find your warmest path to Louis J & Millie Matcek Kocurek Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

LOUIS J & MILLIE MATCEK KOCUREK CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louis J & Millie Matcek Kocurek Charitable?

More from the funding graph

LOUIS J & MILLIE MATCEK KOCUREK CHARITABLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Louis J & Millie Matcek Kocurek Charitable?

More from the funding graph