Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$358kAnimals$233kHealth$171kEnvironment$129kHuman Services$115kEducation$91kRecreation & Sports$90kFood & Nutrition$47kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KSUT PUBLIC RADIO$25,000
NPR$25,000
CHILDREN S HOSPITAL COLORADO$15,000
YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON CONSERVATION$10,000
SONOMA LAND TRUST$10,000
CARMA$10,000
COMM FOUNDATION SERVING$10,000
GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
COLORADO CATTLEMENS AGRICULTURAL LAND TR$7,500
MAKEAWISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO$7,500
CULVER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$7,500
TRU COMMUNITY CARE$7,500
WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY$7,500
COLORADO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL$5,000
ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 14%JUDSON CENTER: $5k → 8%DZI FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $8k → 12%PINION PROJECT: $10k → 15%RESPITE CARE: $5k → 11%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $4k → 12%PINON PROJECT: $5k → 15%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $5k → 11%RESPITE CARE INC: $3k → 11%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $3k → 12%RESPITE CARE: $3k → 11%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $3k → 12%RESPITE CARE: $2k → 11%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $2k → 12%LA JOLLA COMMUNITY CENTER: $400 → 11%LA JOLLA COMMUNITY CENTER: $200 → 11%LA JOLLA COMMUNITY CENTER: $200 → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
CA
CO
KY
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 47 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
35

Total granted

$1.3M
$167k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+7%

Still filing today

64%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SONOMA LAND TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +334%
  • GC
    GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +30%
  • RR
    ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH
    7× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • JA
    JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -9%
  • SO
    SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • GI
    GREENPEACE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
2
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
3
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
4
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
5
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
6
Denver Dumb Friends League

Working with our compassionate community, we will end pet homelessness and animal suffering.

Animals
7
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
8
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
9
The Grand Canyon Trust Inc

The mission of the grand canyon trust is to safeguard the wonders of the grand canyon and the colorado plateau, while supporting the rights of its native peoples.

Environment
10
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
11
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Responsibility. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/57
Grantees still filing
40/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $94,606 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARMA: $46,500 · OtherCARMAIndividual grant recipient: $41,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF CO: $35,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF PETALUMA CALIFORNIA: $32,500 · OtherNPR: $25,000 · OtherJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $25,000 · OtherTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $30,000 · Other+53 more: $409,910 · Other+53 moreLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY: $277,592 · Arts & CultureLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETYKUTE INC DBA KSUT PUBLIC RADIO: $35,000 · Arts & CultureKUTE INC DBA KSUT PUBL…+1 more: $1,400 · Arts & CultureGRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $55,500 · AnimalsGRAYSON-JOCKE…THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $29,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD ANIM…RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $23,250 · AnimalsRANCHO COASTA…LIVING WITH WOLVES LTD: $22,000 · AnimalsLIVING WITH W…SKY DOG SANCTUARY INC: $20,000 · AnimalsSKY DOG SANCT…BARKING LOT: $17,000 · AnimalsBARKING LOTTHE MILO FOUNDATION: $17,000 · AnimalsTHE MILO FOUN…+2 more: $5,000 · AnimalsSONOMA LAND TRUST: $62,500 · EnvironmentDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $20,914 · EnvironmentCOLORADO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $15,000 · EnvironmentDENVER URBAN GARDENS: $7,000 · EnvironmentROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $35,500 · Recreation & SportsHALLECK CREEK RANCH: $29,000 · Recreation & SportsJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTRU COMMUNITY CARE: $19,000 · Human ServicesThe Pinon Project: $15,000 · Human ServicesRESPITE CARE INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesDZI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesJUDSON CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Palm Beach County Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human Services+2 more: $900 · Human ServicesCulver Educational Foundation: $23,500 · EducationGARFIELD COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationASPEN CAMP OF THE DEAF & HARD OF HEARING: $10,000 · EducationONWARD A LEGACY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Education
Other$740,016Arts & Culture$313,992Animals$188,750Environment$105,414Recreation & Sports$74,500Human Services$73,900Education$52,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY: $277,592 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSONOMA LAND TRUST: $62,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetGRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $55,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $35,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKUTE INC DBA KSUT PUBLIC RADIO: $35,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHALLECK CREEK RANCH: $29,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCulver Educational Foundation: $23,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $23,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING WITH WOLVES LTD: $22,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $20,914 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO CARING: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSKY DOG SANCTUARY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTRU COMMUNITY CARE: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $17,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHE MILO FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetThe Pinon Project: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRESPONSIBILITY: $15,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCOLORADO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWILDCARE: $12,828 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRESPITE CARE INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CAMP OF THE DEAF & HARD OF HEARING: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPRESCOTT COLLEGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BERRY GOOD FOOD FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDZI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO CATTLEMEN'S AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER URBAN GARDENS: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTS & HORSES INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDSON CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Palm Beach County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPIONS RETREAT: $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLa Jolla Historical Society: $2,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA JOLLA MUSIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON-JOCKEY CLUB RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds KUTE INC DBA KSUT PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HALLECK CREEK RANCH ↗
  • Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Culver Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WITH WOLVES LTD ↗
  • Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO CARING ↗
  • Who funds PROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SKY DOG SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRU COMMUNITY CARE ↗
  • Who funds YAMPA VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKING LOT ↗
  • Who funds THE MILO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Pinon Project ↗
  • Who funds RESPONSIBILITY ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WILDCARE ↗
  • Who funds RESPITE CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHADES OF PINK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Weyand 62 Char TrustMN34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Weyand 62 Char Trust · Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Virga Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Lord's Place Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977?

Find your warmest path to Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Louis F and Florence H Weyand 1977’s filings →

More from the funding graph