· Private foundation
Virga Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $460k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $112k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRAND CANYON TRUST INC | $62,400 |
| MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK | $50,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA | $35,000 |
| THE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMINAGWTUKWSIUMANI | $35,000 |
| RESOURCES LEGACY FUND | $35,000 |
| NACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK | $30,000 |
| COMMUNITY RADIO PROJECT | $25,000 |
| YOUTH EMPOWERMENT SERVICES FOR DINE BIKEYAH INC | $25,000 |
| FLOWER HILL INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| MONTEZUMA LAND CONSERVANCY | $20,000 |
| MANCOS COMMON PRESS INC | $20,000 |
| BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK | $20,000 |
| CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA | $15,000 |
| THE PINON PROJECT | $15,000 |
| INDIAN COUNTRY GRASSROOTS SUPPORT | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 42 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $537k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA2× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +157%
- CRCOMMUNITY RADIO PROJECT INC KSJD2× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +30%
- OAONWARD A LEGACY FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- TCTHE CONSERVATION ALLIANCEone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +3%
- SCSaigon Childrens Charity USAgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +263%
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.
Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.
Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…
Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.
The water protector legal collective is an indigenous-led legal nonprofit that provides support and advocacy for indigenous peoples and original nations, the earth, and climate justice movements.
Empowering indigenous communities to reconnect with, regenerate, and conserve their sacred peyote medicine.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.
Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.
The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Building leaders to protect the west's land, air, and water.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian Country Grassroots Support and the most unlike its peers is Youth Empowerment Services for Dine Bikeyah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CEDAR MESA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RADIO PROJECT INC KSJD ↗
- Who funds THE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI ↗
- Who funds RESOURCES LEGACY FUND ↗
- Who funds NACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds YOUTH EMPOWERMENT SERVICES FOR DINE BIKEYAH INC ↗
- Who funds FLOWER HILL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MONTEZUMA LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Mancos Common Press Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIAN COUNTRY GRASSROOTS SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds The Pinon Project ↗
- Who funds GREATER GOOD CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds ONWARD A LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE EMERGENCY SHELTER ↗
- Who funds TO NIZHONI ANI ↗
- Who funds Atabey Outdoors ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds Heritage Lands Collective ↗
- Who funds NAVAJO HEALTH FOUNDATION - SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CORTEZ CENTER INC DBA CORTEZ CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds KUTE INC DBA KSUT PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
- Who funds EVLoves LLC ↗
- Who funds The Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice ↗
- Who funds THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds Dolores River Boating Advocates ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS ↗
- Who funds THE INTEROOTS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds GREENING YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Ballantine Family Fund · The Colorado Health Foundation · Onward a Legacy Foundation · The Wilderness Society · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Virga Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- American Whitewater — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.