Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis and Donna Jones Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$432kYouth Development$420kEducation$225kHousing & Shelter$117kCrime & Legal$10kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$1kHealth$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
SENIOR COASTSIDERS$22,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE$20,000
COASTSIDE HOPE$20,000
FULLER YOUTH INSTITUTE$17,500
COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS$15,500
HARAMBEE MINISTRIES$10,000
FRONT PORCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $387k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $24k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $23k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $22k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $20k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $20k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $17k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $16k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $16k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $16k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $15k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $15k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $15k → 7%SENIOR COASTSIDERS: $12k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $10k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $10k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $10k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS: $7k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $20k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $20k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $20k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $18k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $17k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $16k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.2M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+71%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +27%
  • SC
    SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +165%
  • HC
    HARAMBEE CHRISTIAN FAMILY CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $126k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • DO
    DOOR OF HOPEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +369%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES OTHOPEDIC HOSIPTAL
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
2
Colette's Children's Home Inc

Colettes childrens home provides housing and supportive services to homeless women and children with nowhere to turn. we work to remove the barriers that cause displacement and provide the means for transition from homelessness to stable…

Housing & Shelter
3
North Beach Citizens

North Beach Citizens meets the needs of our unhoused and extremely low-income neighbors with trust, integrity, and compassion. Through personalized, innovative programs, we help individuals facing poverty reclaim dignity, stability, and a…

Human Services
4
Hillsides

We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…

Human Services
5
End Homelessness California

To build capacity and community engagement to better serve the most vulnerable population suffering poverty and the homeless crisis.

Human Services
6
Children's Home Society of California

The mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.

Human Services
7
Young Horizons

To provide quality child care and state pre-school programs to children of low-income families in long beach in a caring, loving and learning environment.

Human Services
8
Neighborhood Housing Services of Los Angeles County

Neighborhood housing services of los angeles county (nhs) serves as a catalyst for local residents, business and government representatives to work together to build stronger neighborhoods, improve the quality of life for families of…

Housing & Shelter
9
Housing Resource Center of Monterey Coun

The mission of the housing resource center (hrc) of monterey county is to provide a continuum of housing resources for homeless prevention and affordable housing opportunities. hrc fosters community stability, stronger communities, and…

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
11
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
12
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coastside Hope; the most unlike its peers is Las Candelas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $169,833 · Human ServicesSENIOR COASTSIDERS INCCOASTSIDE HOPE: $121,000 · Human ServicesCOASTSIDE HOPECoastside Childrens Programs: $96,500 · Human ServicesCoastside Childrens ProgramsBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE: $145,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE C…HARAMBEE CHRISTIAN FAMILY CENTER INC: $126,000 · Youth DevelopmentHARAMBEE CHRISTIAN FAMILY …YOUNG LIFE: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentMARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL: $225,000 · EducationMARANATHA HIGH SCHOO…FULLER YOUTH INSTITUTE: $135,000 · OtherFULLER YOUTH INSTIT…ELIZABETH HOUSE: $35,000 · OtherELIZABETH HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…THE CENTER FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $16,365 · Other+6 moreGREENLINE HOUSING FOUNDATION: $76,500 · Housing & ShelterGREENLINE H…Front Porch Communities and Services: $44,900 · Housing & ShelterFront Porch…HRS TRUE HOPE INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Health
Human Services$387,333Youth Development$285,000Education$225,000Other$216,365Housing & Shelter$121,400Philanthropy$1,000Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL: $225,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $169,833 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE: $145,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHARAMBEE CHRISTIAN FAMILY CENTER INC: $126,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetCOASTSIDE HOPE: $121,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCoastside Childrens Programs: $96,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetGREENLINE HOUSING FOUNDATION: $76,500 over 4y, 20% of budgetFront Porch Communities and Services: $44,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHRS TRUE HOPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLas Candelas Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARANATHA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds HARAMBEE CHRISTIAN FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTSIDE HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Coastside Childrens Programs ↗
  • Who funds GREENLINE HOUSING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Front Porch Communities and Services ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HRS TRUE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Las Candelas Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shupper Family FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shupper Family Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis and Donna Jones Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis and Donna Jones Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Louis and Donna Jones Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Louis and Donna Jones Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis and Donna Jones Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph