· Private foundation
Loos Family Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k12 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GATEWAY ON MT ZION CHURCH | $12,300 |
| DWELLING PLACE MINISTRIES | $6,000 |
| LIVING HOPE CHURCH | $6,000 |
| LIVE AGAIN THE WALK | $4,500 |
| WALK WITH ME | $2,145 |
| GOLDEN VIEW CLASSICAL ACADEMY | $1,420 |
| NEW HOPE PERU | $1,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $912 |
| CHARITY WALK UNITED WAY | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| CHILD FUND INTERNATIONAL | $372 |
| WILBUR MINISTRIES | $300 |
| FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH | $83 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 46% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Compassion International Incorporated5× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +16%- WWWalk with Me4× · 2017–2022 · $4k · revenue +266%
- CICHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA5× · 2017–2022 · $2k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- YYWAMone grant, 2017 · $2k
- FFFOREVER FREE MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2018 · $2k
- TSThe Sentinel Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.
Children of Promise provides nutrition education and health care for children in need in developing nations.
The funds are used to assist the vulnerable and under-privileged, providing them with the basic necessities of life, meeting their spiritual, physical and social needs especially addressing child poverty and impact of diseases, disasters…
Care for orphaned, abandoned, malnourished and developmentally disabled children in guatemala, c.a.
We support Catholic healthcare professionals and their families who serve in response to requests from missionary Bishops in underserved areas of the world. The mission of healing provides direct patient care and training for local…
Childcare Worldwide (CW) transforms children's lives by exposing them to the gospel of Jesus Christ, providing for their physical needs, and sponsoring their education. We connect sponsors with children through Christ-based life centers.…
Foundations Christian Montessori Academy was founded to provide a place where parents could send their children to receive an excellent academic education while still teaching them the morals and values of the Christian faith.
Global Strategies empowers communities in the most neglected areas of the world to improve the lives of women and children through healthcare.
Asian Children's Mission, ACM, exists to care, protect, and educate, vulnerable children in Myanmar (Burma).
Breaking the cycle of poverty in Guatemala through education of impoverished children through education.
Concord Christian Academy is a life preparatory educational institution that works in harmony with families to promote the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, physical and creative growth of students, empowering them to live for the glory…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golden View Classical Academy and the most unlike its peers is New Hope Childrens Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Walk with Me ↗
- Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
- Who funds Golden View Classical Academy ↗
- Who funds New Hope Childrens Ministries ↗
- Who funds The Sentinel Foundation ↗
- Who funds RIO GRANDE DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MISSION FRENCH AFRICA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Loos Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.