Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Loma Linda University

LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health professionals and scholars through instruction, example, and the pursuit of truth; - expanding knowledge…

$24M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$22MEducation$12MReligion$1.0MFood & Nutrition$278kInternational$211kYouth Development$15k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $50,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $23,683,112 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,632,662 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FACULTY PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF LLUSM$15,000
LOMA LINDA ACADEMY$13,100
WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS$7,000
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL AUXILLARY$5,350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASSOC OF BAPTIST FOR WORLD EVANGELISM: $13k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY & THE INLAND EMPIRE: $15k → 10%CALIF SOCIETY OF HEALTH SYS PHARMACISTS: $10k → 12%HUERTA DE VALLE: $168k → 14%WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%OMPRAKASH INC: $55k → 9%PAN AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS: $20k → 14%GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SDA: $20k → 8%FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC: $55k → 11%HEALTH MINISTRY FELLOWS ENDOWMENT: $11.7M → 14%WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NORTH AMERICAN DIVISION OF SDA'S: $19k → 8%LLUH-SB Inc: $3.3M → 14%GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SDA: $18k → 8%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF SDA'S: $188k → 14%GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SDA: $10k → 8%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF SDA'S: $188k → 14%GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SDA: $10k → 8%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF SDA'S: $188k → 14%GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SDA: $10k → 8%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SDA CHURCH: $188k → 14%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHURCH OF SDA'S: $188k → 14%LOMA LINDA ACADEMY: $116k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: $95k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: $51k → 14%LOMA LINDA ACADEMY: $41k → 14%Loma Linda Academy: $35k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: $21k → 14%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20k → 14%LOMA LINDA ACADEMY: $16k → 14%FACULTY PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF LLUSM: $15k → 14%LOMA LINDA ACADEMY: $15k → 14%LOMA LINDA ACADEMY: $13k → 14%LOMA LINDA UNIV CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%LOMA LINDA ACADEMY: $13k → 14%LOMA LINDA ACADEMY: $13k → 14%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $11k → 14%ADVENTIST HEALTH INTERNATIONAL: $11k → 14%Loma Linda University Childrens Hospital: $10k → 14%LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%FACULTY PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $15.0M → 14%SAC HEALTH SYSTEM: $583k → 14%SOCIAL ACTION COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM: $582k → 14%Social Action Community Health System: $500k → 14%SOCIAL ACTION HEALTH SYSTEMS: $500k → 14%SOCIAL ACTION COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM: $458k → 14%SAC HEALTH SYSTEM: $417k → 14%MAKING HOPE HAPPEN FOUNDATION: $55k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 12 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$20M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+10%

Still filing today

67%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionInternationalReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Faculty Physicians & Surgeons of LLUSM
    2× · 2020–2025 · $15M · revenue +35%
  • SH
    SAC HEALTH SYSTEM
    6× · 2017–2023 · $3.0M · revenue +355%
  • LL
    LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2018–2021 · $381k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • HM
    HEALTH MINISTRY FELLOWS ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $12M · revenue -91% · 38% of their budget
  • LI
    LLUH-SB INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3.3M · revenue +14%
  • HD
    HUERTA DEL VALLE
    one grant, 2020 · $168k · revenue -7% · 34% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
2
Loma Linda University Health Care

Loma Linda University Health Care is organized to support the clinical teaching programs of Loma Linda University School of Medicine in conjunction with Loma Linda University and Loma Linda University Medical Center by providing medical…

Health
3
Loma Linda University Health

The primary purpose of loma linda university health(lluh) is to help coordinate the healing ministry of the seventh-day adventist church. this function is accomplished by managing the various schools and hospitals of lluh's core and…

—
4
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

—
5
Loma Linda University Med Cntr-Murrieta

Our mission is to continue the teaching and healing ministry of jesus christ in a setting of advancing medical science and to provide a stimulating clinical and research environment for the education of physicians, nurses, and other health…

—
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
8
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
9
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
10
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
11
Usc Health System

The Corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The Corporation is…

Health
12
Physicians for a Healthy California

Physicians for a Healthy California is dedicated to improving community health, growing a diverse physician workforce and promoting health equity. Our programs continue to improve public health, provide clinical practice support and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loma Linda University Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Perinatal Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%14%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%38%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr17%59%20–35yr11%0%35–55yr13%3%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,949

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Faculty Physicians & Surgeons of LLUSM — $15,015,000 · HealthFaculty Physicians & Surgeons of LLUSMSAC HEALTH SYSTEM — $3,040,489 · HealthSAC HEALTH SYSTEM+2 more — $401,300 · HealthHEALTH MINISTRY FELLOWS ENDOWMENT — $11,719,921 · ReligionHEALTH MINISTRY FELLOWS ENDOWMENTLLUH-SB INC — $3,344,523 · OtherLLUH-SB INCLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY SDA CHURCH — $562,500 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNI…LOMA LINDA ACADEMY — $262,093 · OtherLOMA LINDA ACA…+15 more — $317,465 · Other+15 moreHUERTA DEL VALLE — $167,800 · Food & NutritionFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $55,000 · Food & NutritionAdventist Health International — $177,893 · InternationalPAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS — $20,000 · InternationalOMPRAKASH INC — $55,000 · Philanthropy128CM FOUNDATION — $6,500 · Education
Health$18,456,789Religion$11,719,921Other$4,486,581Food & Nutrition$222,800International$197,893Philanthropy$55,000Education$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFaculty Physicians & Surgeons of LLUSM — $15,015,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetHEALTH MINISTRY FELLOWS ENDOWMENT — $11,719,921 over 1y, 38% of budgetSAC HEALTH SYSTEM — $3,040,489 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — $380,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAdventist Health International — $177,893 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetHUERTA DEL VALLE — $167,800 over 1y, 34% of budgetFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC — $55,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMPRAKASH INC — $55,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMaking Hope Happen Foundation — $55,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $41,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $23,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn — $20,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOAKWOOD UNIVERSITY — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE COUNTY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $10,650 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO CO MEDICAL SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCalifornia Society of Health-System Pharmacists — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget128CM FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetNATIONAL PERINATAL ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLoma Linda University Medical Auxiliary — $5,350 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Loma Linda University…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Loma Linda University Shared Services IncCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Loma Linda University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home