Skip to content
Logan Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Logan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$275kHealth$205kYouth Development$195kArts & Culture$132kAnimals$17kEducation$15kRecreation & Sports$8kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA$25,000
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$20,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$20,000
HIRAM COLLEGE$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC$15,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
EARTHJUSTICE$10,000
BLACK KNIGHTS ATHLETIC CLUB$8,000
CONNECTICUT VEGAN CENTER INC$5,000
BOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT$5,000
JP FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ROTACARE BAY AREA INC: $5k → 8%EARTHJUSTICE: $10k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 7%JP FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $5k → 9%CONNECTICUT VEGAN CENTER INC: $5k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $25k → 8%HIRAM COLLEGE: $15k → 12%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $20k → 6%CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $30k → 8%EARTHJUSTICE: $10k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10k → 7%JP FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $5k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $25k → 8%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $15k → 6%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%EARTHJUSTICE: $10k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%JP FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $5k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $25k → 8%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $15k → 6%CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $25k → 8%EARTHJUSTICE: $5k → 10%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $25k → 8%PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $10k → 6%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%EARTHJUSTICE: $5k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $25k → 8%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $25k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $25k → 8%CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $25k → 8%EARTHJUSTICE: $10k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $15k → 8%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $25k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $15k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC: $15k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $25k → 8%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $25k → 8%SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $20k → 8%CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $20k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $15k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $15k → 8%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $15k → 8%CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $15k → 8%CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$776k · 8 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$776k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+46%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +70%
  • CO
    CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $130k · revenue +157%
  • TP
    THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • ROTACARE BAY AREA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +55%
  • CP
    COVE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
3
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
4
South Carolina Environmental Law Project Inc

We use our legal expertise to protect the land, water and communities across south carolina.

Environment
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
7
Terraset

Terraset uses philanthropic capital to purchase permanent, high-quality carbon removal. we pool donations from individuals, foundations, family offices, and donor advised funds, and make strategic purchases of high-quality carbon removal…

Environment
8
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
9
Harpeth Conservancy

To restore and protect clean water and healthy ecosystems for rivers in tennessee by employing scientific expertise and collaborative relationships to develop, promote, and support broad community stewardship and action.

Environment
10
The Natural Science Center of Greensboro Inc Dba Greensboro Science Center

The mission of the center is inspiring curiosity and connecting communities through science and conservation. we accomplish this by providing ever-evolving experiences where exploration and imagination intersect, igniting a lifelong…

Arts & Culture
11
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
12
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Piedmont Environmental Council; the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow Youth Repertory. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $195,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CEN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $195,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH …SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $95,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENT…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $35,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVAN…BLACK KNIGHTS ATHLETIC CLUB: $8,000 · Other+4 more: $20,000 · Other+4 moreTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $65,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRO…EARTHJUSTICE: $65,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT: $15,000 · EnvironmentBOTANICAL GARDEN OF…CHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $130,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLOTTESVILLE O…+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureJP FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $16,000 · AnimalsROCKFISH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $1,000 · AnimalsHIRAM COLLEGE: $15,000 · Education
Youth Development$195,000Health$195,000Other$158,000Environment$145,000Arts & Culture$131,500Animals$17,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $195,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC: $195,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE OPERA: $130,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $95,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $65,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJP FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $16,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetHIRAM COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetROTACARE BAY AREA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFISH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area …Oakwood Foundation Ch…Caplin FoundationCharlottesville Track…The Genan FoundationThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · Caplin Foundation · Charlottesville Track Club Inc · The Genan Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Logan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Logan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Logan Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Logan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Logan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home