Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lockhart James H & Florence D

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$612kHealth$365kHuman Services$144kYouth Development$141kFood & Nutrition$26kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $130k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$3,188
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE AMERICAN UNIV IN CAIRO$19,124
KINGSLEY ASSOCIATION$15,938
Individual grant recipient$12,750
THE CHOATE SCHOOL FDN INC$6,374
WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYS INC$6,374
SALVATION ARMY$6,374
STERLING COLLEGE$6,374
Y M C A OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$6,374
FORBES HEALTH FOUNDATION$6,374
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PGH FDN$6,374
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$6,374
ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL$6,374
PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY HOSP$6,374
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$6,374
Individual grant recipient$6,374
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Y M C A OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $18k → 11%Y M C A OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $14k → 11%Y M C A OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $6k → 11%Y M C A OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $6k → 11%Y M C A OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $4k → 11%Y M C A OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOME: $4k → 11%PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOME: $4k → 11%PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOME: $2k → 11%PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOME: $2k → 11%PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOME: $910 → 11%PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOME: $870 → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $9k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $7k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $3k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $3k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $2k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
KY
NM
KS
AR
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 36 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
0

Total granted

$1.5M
$0

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $157k · revenue +45%
  • TK
    THE KINGSLEY ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $131k · revenue +79%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $52k · revenue +51%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Point Park University

    Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

    —
    2
    Albright College

    As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

    Education
    3
    Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

    The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

    Education
    4
    Wilson College

    Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

    Education
    5
    Marietta College

    Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

    Education
    6
    Delaware Valley University

    See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

    —
    7
    Lehigh University

    The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

    Education
    8
    University of New Haven

    The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

    Education
    9
    University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    —
    10
    Manhattanville University

    To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

    Education
    11
    Furman University

    The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

    Education
    12
    University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

    Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Pittsburgh. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    23/23
    Grantees still filing
    19/23
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE KINGSLEY ASSOCIATION: $130,860 · OtherTHE KINGSLEY ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $104,686 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CHOATE SCHOOL FDN INC: $52,342 · OtherTHE CHOATE SCHOOL FDN INCFORBES HEALTH FOUNDATION: $52,342 · OtherFORBES HEALTH FOUNDATIONWEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYS INC: $52,342 · OtherWEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYS INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $52,342 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $52,342 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL: $52,342 · OtherALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITALPRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY HOSP: $52,342 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY HOSPMUSKINGUM COLLEGE: $26,174 · OtherALLAHABAD AGR INST INDIA E862337: $26,174 · Other+3 more: $30,302 · OtherTHE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO: $157,030 · EducationTHE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIROThe Trustees of Princeton University: $52,342 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $52,342 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHSTERLING COLLEGE: $52,342 · EducationSTERLING COLLEGEWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $26,174 · EducationWESTMINSTER COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS: $26,174 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKSTUSCULUM UNIVERSITY: $26,174 · EducationTUSCULUM UNIVERSITYCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $26,174 · EducationCHATHAM UNIVERSITYMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $26,174 · EducationMONMOUTH COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $19,426 · Education+1 more: $10,468 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $52,342 · HealthCHILDREN'S HO…EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION: $27,044 · HealthEYE AND EAR F…ST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $26,174 · HealthST MARGARET F…Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation: $26,174 · HealthPresbyterian …BREATHE PENNSYLVANIA: $26,174 · HealthBREATHE PENNS…TRUDEAU INSTITUTE INC: $10,468 · HealthTRUDEAU INSTI…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $52,342 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCES: $26,174 · Human ServicesPASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES: $13,086 · Human ServicesPASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $26,174 · PhilanthropyGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $10,468 · Youth Development
    Other$684,590Education$474,820Health$168,376Human Services$91,602Philanthropy$26,174Youth Development$10,468

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO: $157,030 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KINGSLEY ASSOCIATION: $130,860 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $52,342 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $52,342 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $52,342 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING COLLEGE: $52,342 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $52,342 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEYE AND EAR FOUNDATION: $27,044 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $26,174 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $26,174 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPresbyterian Healthcare Foundation: $26,174 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS: $26,174 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTUSCULUM UNIVERSITY: $26,174 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES: $26,174 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $26,174 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $26,174 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBREATHE PENNSYLVANIA: $26,174 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $26,174 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $19,426 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES: $13,086 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA UNIVERSITY: $10,468 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUDEAU INSTITUTE INC: $10,468 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $10,468 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO ↗
    • Who funds THE KINGSLEY ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
    • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
    • Who funds STERLING COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds ST MARGARET FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS ↗
    • Who funds TUSCULUM UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES ↗
    • Who funds CHATHAM UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds PASSAVANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds BREATHE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
    • Who funds MONMOUTH COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE ↗
    • Who funds PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES ↗
    • Who funds AURORA UNIVERSITY ↗
    • Who funds TRUDEAU INSTITUTE INC ↗
    • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Mason Martha LockhartPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Mason Martha Lockhart · M L Mason Mem Fund 12-26-35 · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Lockhart James H & Florence D funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lockhart James H & Florence D. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
    • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lockhart James H & Florence D’s filings →

    More from the funding graph