Skip to content
Lloyd Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Lloyd Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$258kEducation$142kHuman Services$79kArts & Culture$53kCommunity Improvement$52kHousing & Shelter$19kInternational$18kYouth Development$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$12,916
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA FDN$25,823
BIKE PITTSBURGH INC$15,824
YWCA GREATER PITTSBURGH$12,916
LA SALLE UNIVERSITY$10,000
GWENS GIRLS INCORPORATED$10,000
WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMUNITY CO$2,916
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $8k → 7%MEADVILLE YMCA: $10k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $4k → 11%CITY OF ASYLUM PITTSBURGH: $13k → 11%CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION ADVOCACY CENTER: $8k → 11%REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN WOMANS ASSOCIATION: $15k → 11%EARTHEN VESSELS OUTREACH: $8k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $5k → 11%YWCA GREATER PITTSBURGH: $13k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$322k · 4 repeat orgs$390k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
39

Total granted

$322k
$339k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+25%

Still filing today

75%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $243k
  • LP
    LITERACY PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2019–2022 · $27k · revenue +105%
  • CU
    CHATHAM UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2022 · $27k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • OF
    OPEN FIELDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue +226%
  • RP
    REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN WOMAN'S ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -5%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FLAG FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +41% · 53% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
3
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
4
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
5
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
6
The Regional Opportunity Center D/B/a Vibrant Pittsburgh

Vibrant pittsburgh's mission is to accelerate the business community toward equitable, inclusive, and diverse workplaces, creating a future-forward region.

Arts & Culture
7
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
8
Girls Inc of Greater Pittsburgh

Girls inc of greater pittsburgh empowers girls to imagine a broader future through a curriculum grounded on female role models delivered by college women mentors, who are themselves mentored by professional women.

Human Services
9
Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance

Gpca's mission is to break the cycle of generational proverty by ensuring equitable distribution of the resources for vulnerable children, families, and communities. our vision is to be philadelphia's catalyst for community empowerment and…

Human Services
10
Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation

The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…

Community Improvement
11
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
12
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Children's Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Fineview Citizens Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
22/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA FOUNDATION: $242,561 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA FOUNDATIONBIKE PITTSBURGH INC: $15,824 · Other+22 more: $167,093 · Other+22 moreLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $27,168 · EducationLITERACY PITTSB…CHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $26,821 · EducationCHATHAM UNIVERS…WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $13,158 · EducationWESTMINSTER COL…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $12,819 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE…LA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationLA SALLE UNIVER…READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH: $10,000 · EducationREADING IS FUND…+1 more: $1,542 · EducationREFORMED PRESBYTERIAN WOMAN'S ASSOCIATION: $15,278 · Human ServicesREFORMED PRE…YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION GREATER PITTSBURGH: $12,916 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'…CITY OF ASYLUM: $12,500 · Human ServicesCITY OF ASYL…MEADVILLE AREA FAMILY YMCA: $10,259 · Human ServicesMEADVILLE AR…EARTHEN VESSELS OUTREACH: $7,685 · Human ServicesEARTHEN VESS…CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION ADVOCACY CENT: $7,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN IM…YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $7,500 · Human ServicesYWCA TRI-COU…CENTER OF LIFE: $5,000 · Human ServicesCENTER OF LI…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $4,000 · Human ServicesPITTSBURGH OPERA INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FLAG FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTRWIB INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR: $5,000 · Community ImprovementLawrenceville United: $2,000 · Community ImprovementVAGABOND MISSIONS: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentGwens Girls Inc: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPEN FIELD: $18,000 · International
Other$425,478Education$101,508Human Services$82,638Arts & Culture$40,000Community Improvement$32,000Youth Development$25,000International$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $27,168 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $26,821 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH OPERA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN FIELD: $18,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBIKE PITTSBURGH INC: $15,824 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetREFORMED PRESBYTERIAN WOMAN'S ASSOCIATION: $15,278 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL FLAG FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetVAGABOND MISSIONS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRWIB INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hampden Family Center Inc: $13,189 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $13,158 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION GREATER PITTSBURGH: $12,916 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $12,819 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $12,562 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY OF ASYLUM: $12,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND: $11,323 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMEADVILLE AREA FAMILY YMCA: $10,259 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLA SALLE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGwens Girls Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThree Rivers Rowing Association: $8,085 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH: $7,625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCORE Foundation: $6,377 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOUR GIVING KITCHEN PITTSBURGH INC: $5,069 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetTHE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER OF LIFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFineview Citizens Council: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSVOICE: $1,735 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS: $1,542 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Grable FoundationHillman Family Founda…The Heinz EndowmentsThe Pittsburgh Founda…Richard King Mellon F…Dollar Bank FoundationEqt FoundationThe Fine FoundationThe Buhl FoundationThe Jack Buncher Foun…Opportunity FoundationUpmc Group
The Grable FoundationPA42.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Grable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Heinz Endowments · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Dollar Bank Foundation · Eqt Foundation · The Fine Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Opportunity Foundation · Upmc Group

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lloyd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lloyd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lloyd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home