Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dollar Bank Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
122
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Philanthropy$1.7MCommunity Improvement$1.7MEducation$1.1MHealth$957kHuman Services$608kHousing & Shelter$489kYouth Development$368kArts & Culture$334kOther$0
02FY2024 · 122 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k65 grants · $214k
  • $10k–50k53 grants · $829k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $320k
$8,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROHEALTH FOUNDATION$120,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PA$100,000
THE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB$50,000
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES$50,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND$48,655
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH$38,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST OHIO$35,000
GIFTS UNDER THE CORPORATE MATCHING GIFT PROGRAM$34,332
HAMPTON ROADS WORKFORCE FOUNDATION$30,000
THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$28,200
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ALLEGANY COUNTY$28,000
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORP$25,000
CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
VILLAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION$25,000
ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $553k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YWCA WESTMORELAND COUNTY: $10k → 10%MARYLAND CASA ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%FEEDING THE SPIRIT: $5k → 10%EL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES INC: $4k → 13%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $20k → 11%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $10k → 12%UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WESTERN MARYLAND: $10k → 18%UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WESTERN MARYLAND: $10k → 18%UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WESTERN MARYLAND: $10k → 18%OFF THE FLOOR PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%ALLEN PLACE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5k → 11%TOGETHER WE CAN FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%THE UP CENTER: $7k → 19%CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF EASTERN VIRGINIA AKA THE UP CENTER: $3k → 19%UNION MISSION: $4k → 19%JUBILEE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS: $10k → 11%STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS: $10k → 11%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 11%ORGANIZE OHIO: $5k → 17%FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $25k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $21k → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $20k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%STRONG WOMEN STRONG GIRLS: $10k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $15k → 17%PASSAGES: $5k → 17%PASSAGES: $5k → 17%PASSAGES: $4k → 17%THE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB: $50k → 11%OUTREACH TEEN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 11%YMCA OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $10k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $10k → 17%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $3k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $3k → 11%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $5k → 17%ANOTHER CHANCE OF OHIO: $3k → 17%JUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%GREATER VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 11%HELLO NEIGHBOR: $10k → 11%HELLO NEIGHBOR: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH: $38k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $15k → 11%YWCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%CIVICALLY INC: $10k → 11%NORTHSIDE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT: $25k → 11%ALLEN PLACE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 158 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

158 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2024, 75 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

158
149

Total granted

$5.7M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+21%

Still filing today

79%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $283k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $600k · revenue +8%
  • VC
    VILLAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +94%
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    3× · 2020–2023 · $134k · revenue +242%

Funded once

  • PE
    Pittsburgh Economic and Industrial Development Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +42% · 30% of their budget
  • TM
    The Musical Arts Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $80k · revenue +39%
  • LM
    LIFE MALE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue ×14

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
2
The Regional Opportunity Center D/B/a Vibrant Pittsburgh

Vibrant pittsburgh's mission is to accelerate the business community toward equitable, inclusive, and diverse workplaces, creating a future-forward region.

Arts & Culture
3
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
4
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
5
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
6
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
7
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
8
Urban League of Greater Philadelphia

The mission of the urban league is to empower disadvantaged, underresourced and marginalized communities to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

—
9
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
10
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
11
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
12
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is The Greenwood Plan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Social ClubsPhilanthropic FoundationsVeterans Service Organizati…Animal Rescue and Care Serv…Charitable Donor TrustsFamily Philanthropic Founda…Faith-Based Community Servi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr13%8%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr17%27%35–55yr17%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr17%29%35–55yr17%33%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/269
the rest of the field
11%
3,053/27,054

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

254 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 254 of the 349 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
249/254
Grantees still filing
164/254
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GIFTS UNDER THE CORPORATE MATCHING GIFT PROGRAM — $441,770 · OtherGIFTS UNDER THE CORPORATE MATCHING GIFT PR…ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $134,000 · Other+107 more — $2,266,255 · Other+107 moreTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $738,764 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF …UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $193,103 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREA…THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $162,285 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOU…THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND — $44,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $78,286 · Philanthropy+4 moreNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $500,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIE…VILLAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION — $150,000 · Community ImprovementVILLAGE CAPITAL CO…Pittsburgh Economic and Industrial Development Corporation — $100,000 · Community ImprovementPittsburgh Economi…LOCUS IMPACT FUND — $100,000 · Community ImprovementLOCUS IMPACT FUNDPittsburgh Community Reinvestment G — $62,500 · Community Improvement+13 more — $304,500 · Community Improvement+13 moreTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 · HealthTHE METROHEA…ST BARNABAS CHARITIES INC — $34,000 · Health+11 more — $178,750 · Health+11 moreCHATHAM UNIVERSITY — $133,000 · EducationCHATHAM U…CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationCUYAHOGA …Allegheny County Library Association — $85,000 · EducationAllegheny…STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $80,200 · EducationSTOREHOUS…READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $50,000 · EducationREADING I…SCRANTON ROAD MINISTRIES CDC — $33,625 · EducationLIFE MALE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY — $30,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS — $30,000 · Education+10 more — $121,000 · Education+10 moreLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $61,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB — $50,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH — $38,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND — $35,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION — $30,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INC OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $30,000 · Human ServicesNorth Side Partnership Project — $25,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION OF HOPE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesPassages Connecting Fathers & Sons — $21,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION GREATER PITTSBURGH — $20,250 · Human ServicesHELLO NEIGHBOR — $20,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · Human Services+15 more — $125,400 · Human ServicesDAISY WILSON ARTIST COMMUNITY INC DBA AUGUST WILSON HOUSE — $85,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts Association — $80,000 · Arts & CultureBraddock Carnegie Library Assoc — $62,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH URBAN MAGNET PROJECT — $20,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC — $19,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,842,025Philanthropy$1,266,438Community Improvement$1,217,000Health$812,750Education$662,825Human Services$500,650Arts & Culture$286,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $738,764 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $500,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $193,103 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $162,285 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVILLAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION — $150,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $134,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY — $133,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPittsburgh Economic and Industrial Development Corporation — $100,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetLOCUS IMPACT FUND — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAllegheny County Library Association — $85,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDAISY WILSON ARTIST COMMUNITY INC DBA AUGUST WILSON HOUSE — $85,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UNLIMITED — $81,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $80,604 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $80,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association — $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSH GIBSON FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $72,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPittsburgh Community Reinvestment G — $62,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBraddock Carnegie Library Assoc — $62,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $61,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH GATEWAYS CORPORATION — $60,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetEAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHAMPTON ROADS WORKFORCE FOUNDATION — $57,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC — $52,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $50,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CITIZEN SCIENCE LAB — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE — $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND — $44,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE PROMISE CENTER OF HOMEWOOD INC — $40,456 over 2y, 23% of budgetThe Greenwood Plan — $40,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMOTHER SETON HOUSE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH — $38,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUnited Way of South Hampton Roads — $37,859 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST BARNABAS CHARITIES INC — $34,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSCRANTON ROAD MINISTRIES CDC — $33,625 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetHAMPTON ROADS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE MALE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY — $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSpanish American Committee — $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRESIDENTS COUNCIL FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family Founda…The Pittsburgh Founda…Richard King Mellon F…The Grable FoundationThe United Way of Sou…The Heinz EndowmentsUpmc GroupThe George Gund Found…The Buhl FoundationThe Cleveland Foundat…The Reinberger Founda…Eqt Foundation
Hillman Family FoundationsPA88.3× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · Upmc Group · The George Gund Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Eqt Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dollar Bank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Maryland Casa Association Inc — 60% of income from government
  • Casa of Western Maryland Inc — 51% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
79report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 349 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines