· Private foundation
Llelanie S Orcutt Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI | $10,000 |
| HEARTHSTONE SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN | $5,000 |
| SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT (SOME) | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HEARTHSTONE SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ART | $5,000 |
| THE CARTER CENTER | $5,000 |
| WETA | $5,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $4,000 |
| WAAR (WOMEN AT REAL RISK) | $4,000 |
| BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| SEA ISLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $3,000 |
| NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE | $2,000 |
| NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
28 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- DCDUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +24%
- SISea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +107%
- SISOME INC5× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- DCDUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGEone grant, 2020 · $10k
- UCUC CUMBERLAND COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $4k
- ISINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BASSISTSone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +12%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
As an organization, the institute of food technologists is focusing its work in four main areas, or "roles and goals." each is wide-reaching and helps to advance our mission.steward for the profession and its community - provide learning,…
Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…
How this is measured
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DUTCHESS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Sea Island Habitat For Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BASSISTS ↗
- Who funds THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUDOUN HUNGER RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Llelanie S Orcutt Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Llelanie S Orcutt Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Llelanie S Orcutt’s filings →