· Private foundation
Lindy and Brad Berkley Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $106k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $56,300 |
| WILLIAMS EDUCATION FUND | $50,000 |
| SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $14,030 |
| CHILDRENS CANCER FUND | $12,500 |
| DALLAS STARS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LUKA DONCIC FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS | $7,000 |
| CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL | $5,000 |
| WOMENS ALZHEIMERS MOVEMENT | $4,200 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $3,000 |
| CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER | $2,675 |
| COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS | $2,600 |
| THE WEEKDAY SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| ST PHILIPS SCHOOL | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $61k · revenue +3%
- TETHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue +20%
- YLYOUNG LIFE2× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- RCREACHING CHAMPIONS JOINING HEARTS INCone grant, 2023 · $100k
- CBCATTLE BARON'S BALLone grant, 2023 · $10k
- SBSWEETHEART BALL INCone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…
Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
The foundation was created to support the boys & girls clubs of greater dallas inc.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…
The dallas police youth foundation was formed in 2013 in an effort to create a sustainable financial avenue to support the youth outreach efforts and programs of dpd. dpyf determined that support for youth outreach programs was too…
The organization's primary purpose is to support the charitable and educational programs of clayton dabney for kids with cancer, a texas nonprofit corporation.
The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.
Durham devils giving, inc.'s (ddgi) mission is to conduct charitable and educational activities, including, without limitation, providing grants and other support to nonprofit organizations, and educating and empowering collegiate athletes…
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is The Luka Doncic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REACHING CHAMPIONS JOINING HEARTS INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SEAL FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LUKA DONCIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS STARS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds SOUND OFF ↗
- Who funds CLAYTON DABNEY FOR KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
- Who funds Dec My Room Inc ↗
- Who funds LADIES AUXILIARY OF ARLINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds CARRY THE LOAD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Dallas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lindy and Brad Berkley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lindy and Brad Berkley Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lindy and Brad Berkley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.