Skip to content

· Private foundation

Linda and Simon Eyles Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$256kAnimals$228kArts & Culture$31kPublic Benefit$20kHousing & Shelter$10kFood & Nutrition$7kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$925k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$35,000
HOUSTON SPCA$15,000
America's VetDogs$10,000
THE MENIL COLLECTION$5,000
Houston Methodist Hospital Foundation$5,000
Avenue$4,000
Rescue Pets Movement$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Telluride Mountain Club$2,000
Houston Food Bank$2,000
HOUSTON HEIGHTS ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 11 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$549k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+12%

Still filing today

82%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CulturePublic BenefitRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MK
    Mission K9 Rescue Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $120k · revenue +71%
  • TM
    THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +55%
  • SP
    Special Pals Inc
    2× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • HP
    Houston Parks Board
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -30%
  • C
    CarePartners
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
2
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
3
Houston Cares Animal Rescue

Houston Cares Rescue is a volunteer organization rescuing animals from the streets, and occasionally from shelters, in Houston, TX, and caring for them primarily with foster families until a loving home can be found. We operate a…

Animals
4
West Houston Animal Rescue

Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

Animals
5
Hermann Park Conservancy

Hermann Park Conservancy is a citizens organization dedicated to the stewardship and improvement of Hermann Park - today and for generations to come.

Environment
6
Humane Society of Harris County

Humane Society of Harris County's mission remains steadfast: to provide high-quality adoption, transport, foster, Trap, neuter, release, and pet food pantry services to our community. Yet, with a fresh perspective and a renewed passion,…

—
7
Houston Petset

Houston petset is a nonprofit organization dedicated to ending the homelessness and suffering of companion animals.

Animals
8
Humane Heroes Inc

The Organizations mission is to save the lives of adoptable dogs and cats from shelters throughout Texas, to decrease overpopulation of animals through low-cost veterinary services, and to enhance the lives of pets through educational…

Animals
9
Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc

The Humane Society of Tampa Bay is dedicated to ending animal homelessness and providing care and comfort for companion animals in need. Our vision is "Leading the way because every life counts". In 2025, we saved 10,631 animals.

Animals
10
Hm Pooches Rescue and Sanctuary Inc

HM POOCHES RESCUE AND SANCTUARY, INC.'S purpose includes all those activities, work, and objectives as related to the adoption, rescue and/or humane treatment of dogs and other animals and includes, but is not limited to, providing for the…

Animals
11
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
12
Paws for Heroes

To provide comfort & companionship to veterans by rescuing shelter dogs that have been carefully evaluated, selected and professionally trained for the purpose of providing emotional support & companionship.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is The Houston Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $245,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERAVENUE: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $10,500 · OtherMission K9 Rescue Inc: $120,000 · AnimalsMission K9 Rescue IncHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY …+2 more: $7,500 · AnimalsHouston Heights Association: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMenil Foundation Inc: $13,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $20,000 · Public BenefitTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 · HealthTelluride Mountain Club: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsHouston Parks Board: $2,000 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$265,500Animals$227,500Arts & Culture$28,500Public Benefit$20,000Health$11,000Recreation & Sports$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMission K9 Rescue Inc: $120,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Heights Association: $15,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMenil Foundation Inc: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Pals Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTelluride Mountain Club: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHouston Parks Board: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mission K9 Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Heights Association ↗
  • Who funds Menil Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Special Pals Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Telluride Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds Houston Parks Board ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Linda and Simon Eyles Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Linda and Simon Eyles Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Linda and Simon Eyles’ filings →

More from the funding graph