Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Linda & Alan Kahn Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$223k
Granted FY2024still arriving
62
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

62% of Linda & Alan Kahn Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 38 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Linda & Alan Kahn Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 46 organizations, $223k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

49
19
32
20
45
21
31
22
26
23
46
24
38
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$641kPhilanthropy$436kAnimals$164kArts & Culture$142kReligion$95kCivil Rights$63kHealth$23kScience & Tech$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k56 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$500
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$100,000
WNYC$20,000
SAVE KITTY FOUNDATION$15,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$15,000
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF STAMFORD$10,000
BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
FOREST HILLS JEWISH CENTER$5,819
MANHATTAN THEATER CLUB$5,008
COLUMBIA COLLEGE$5,000
NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE$5,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$3,580
THE BREARLEY SCHOOL$2,500
BIDEAWEE$2,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK$2,500
FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $250 → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 8%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $250 → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 7%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $261 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $200 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $100 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $100 → 17%APOPO US INC: $1k → 14%APOPO US INC: $1k → 14%APOPO US INC: $1k → 14%APOPO US INC: $513 → 14%WOMEN IN NEED: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 78 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

78 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
23

Total granted

$1.0M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+40%

Still filing today

72%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $226k · revenue +50%
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $43k · revenue +104%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • PH
    PELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • WI
    WOMEN IN FILM & VIDEO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +394%
  • ST
    SHIR TIKVAH (IMMIGRANT JUSTICE)
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

7
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International House and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Station Square Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Sports ProgramsLocal Food System Organizat…Jewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and Shelter
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%10%20–35yr13%47%35–55yr16%38%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/79
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,681

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/76
Grantees still filing
61/76
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $429,963 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND+1 more — $6,000 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBIA COLLEGE — $231,160 · OtherCOLUMBIA COLLEGEFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF STAMFORD — $40,000 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF…FOREST HILLS JEWISH CENTER — $36,364 · OtherFOREST HILLS JEWISH CENTERCONGREGATION EMANUEL — $18,930 · Other+49 more — $102,889 · Other+49 moreBARNARD COLLEGE — $226,001 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGEVanderbilt University — $100,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 · EducationTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL — $18,380 · Education+8 more — $23,779 · Education+8 moreNEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC — $43,080 · AnimalsNEIGHBORH…SAVEKITTY FOUNDATION — $28,000 · AnimalsSAVEKITTY…THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $21,282 · AnimalsTHE ANIMA…ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $10,000 · AnimalsANIMAL CA…BIDEAWEE INC — $9,500 · AnimalsBIDEAWEE …THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $8,021 · AnimalsTHE HUMAN…+12 more — $16,875 · Animals+12 moreNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO — $64,500 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK …MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $24,944 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN…NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK …FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $14,500 · Arts & CultureFACING HI…+7 more — $6,430 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $2,000 · Civil RightsTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $8,650 · HealthOPHTHALMICEDGE INC — $6,500 · HealthRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC — $1,000 · Health+6 more — $2,021 · Health
Philanthropy$435,963Other$429,343Education$388,160Animals$136,758Arts & Culture$130,374Civil Rights$62,000Health$18,171

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $429,963 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $226,001 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO — $64,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC — $43,080 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetNEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAVEKITTY FOUNDATION — $28,000 over 7y, 30% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $24,944 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $21,282 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE — $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL — $18,380 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $14,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC — $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC — $8,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $8,021 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO — $7,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPHTHALMICEDGE INC — $6,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN FILM & VIDEO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMALKIND INC — $4,020 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAPOPO US INC — $3,538 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HAVEN INC — $3,094 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR HISTORIC AIRCRAFT RECOVERY — $3,050 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWNET — $2,430 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA GREENHOUSE NURSERY SCHOOL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC — $1,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC — $1,761 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF STATION SQUARE INC — $1,756 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLawrence Woodmere Academy — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $725 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $661 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALVARY FUND INC — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL HOUSE — $504 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CATS INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAVEKITTY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE
  • Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds THE BREARLEY SCHOOL
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
  • Who funds PELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL OF NEW YORK CITY INC
  • Who funds BIDEAWEE INC
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES
  • Who funds OPHTHALMICEDGE INC
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds WOMEN IN FILM & VIDEO INC
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds ANIMALKIND INC
  • Who funds APOPO US INC
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY22.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · American Express Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Linda & Alan Kahn Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • Perkins School for the Blind7% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Linda & Alan Kahn Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Linda & Alan Kahn Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph