Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Levine Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$794k
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$1.0MEducation$403kHuman Services$286kPublic Benefit$270kArts & Culture$249kEnvironment$206kReligion$165kYouth Development$89kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $511k
$2,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST$100,000
SAN JUAN COUNTY MUSEUM SALMON RUINS$85,562
Individual grant recipient$75,000
LEGACY TRADE COLLEGE$50,000
AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE$50,000
GRATEFUL DIVERS INC$50,000
WE PLAYERS$50,000
JUMPSTART BRIDGE ATL JUNIOR BRIDGE$50,000
VOICE THEATRE$45,000
VIVEROS DE AMOR$35,000
HOMES4FAMILIES$30,000
HOW ON EARTH ENTERTAINMENT$28,000
COC FOUNDATION$25,000
WICK THEATRE COSTUME MUSEUM$15,000
IGLESIA DE CRISTO ELIM SACRAMENTO$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $100k → 12%ONE SPIRIT: $2k → 14%AMERICAN ASSOC OF CAREGIVING YOUTH: $1k → 11%KIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $1k → 13%DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
NM
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of Levine Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Levine Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 8 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-24%

Still filing today

38%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $663k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionReligionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UV
    US VOTE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $270k · revenue +41% · 32% of their budget
  • AD
    ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST
    2× · 2023–2025 · $200k · revenue +48%
  • TI
    TRIANGLE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF ANN ARBOR
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • RT
    RAILS TO TRAILS PROJECT ECO TRAIL
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Bread Project

When adults have a second chance and are able to make a successful transition to employment and have ongoing access to further education to increase their economic opportunities, they improve not only their own lives but those of their…

Employment
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
4
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

7
Project Bread-the Walk for Hunger Inc

Project bread integrates expertise earned through directly serving individuals, research, advocacy, and community engagement for a comprehensive approach that achieves large scale, sustainable impact to prevent hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
9
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

10
Pathways Kitchen

Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward

Crime & Legal
11
Childnet Inc

Childnet's mission is to protect broward and palm beach counties' abused, abandoned and neglected children, to ensure their safety and to promptly provide them with a permanent, loving home.

Human Services
12
The Women's Bakery Inc

The women's bakery is a social enterprise that empowers women through accredited training, employment, and social programming, and builds bakeries that sell high quality and affordable breads to east african communities.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cascadia Quest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Animal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Classical Music EnsemblesDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Pantries & AssistanceNative Hawaiian Community D…Early Childhood Education C…Public Library SupportCommunity Health CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Public University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%9%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
12/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF ANN ARBOR — $500,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF ANN ARBORJEWISH FOUNDATION GREATER ANN ARBOR — $499,500 · OtherJEWISH FOUNDATION GREATER ANN ARBORRAILS TO TRAILS PROJECT ECO TRAIL — $200,000 · OtherRAILS TO TRAILS PROJECT ECO TRAILSAN JUAN COUNTY MUSEUM SALMON RUINS — $85,562 · OtherCHABAD STUDENT CENTER — $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $75,000 · Other+46 more — $651,065 · Other+46 moreUS VOTE FOUNDATION INC — $270,000 · Civil RightsUS VOTE FO…ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $200,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANC…AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesAID TO VI…+4 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · Education+2 more — $2,000 · EducationWE PLAYERS — $50,000 · Arts & CultureVOICE THEATRE INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $8,500 · Arts & CultureVIVEROS DE AMOR CO — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOCA HELPING HANDS INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionBerkeley Food Network — $2,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS INC — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,091,127Civil Rights$270,000Human Services$255,000Education$152,000Arts & Culture$108,500Youth Development$35,000Food & Nutrition$13,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUS VOTE FOUNDATION INC — $270,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST — $200,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetVOICE THEATRE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetVIVEROS DE AMOR CO — $35,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetMISSION CIRCLE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTRIANGLE INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBerkeley Food Network — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCascadia Quest — $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budget18TH STREET ARTS COMPLEX — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSweet Dream Makers Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYGROUND — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BICOL CLINIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DAN MARINO FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRECIOUS LAMB PRESCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS IN DISTRESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds US VOTE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST
  • Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WE PLAYERS
  • Who funds AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC
  • Who funds VOICE THEATRE INC
  • Who funds VIVEROS DE AMOR CO
  • Who funds MISSION CIRCLE INC
  • Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH7.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Levine Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 90%
  • Triangle Inc90% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Levine Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Levine Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph