Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Levin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$53kEducation$20kReligion$16kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$10kInternational$2kEnvironment$1kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
$122
Median grant
3
States reached
$228k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION$30,500
TEMPLE SHALOM$1,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDENS$315
WOMENS CULTURAL ALLIANCE$122
VASARI CARES FOUNDATION$100
AMBLER THEATER FOUNDATION$100
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$51
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SCHUYLKILL YMCA: $750 → 12%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%OPEN ARMS MINISTRY: $1k → 12%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%OPEN ARMS MINISTRY: $1k → 12%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $31k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
MA
PA
NJ
MD
KS
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$102k · 27 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
45

Total granted

$102k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+3%

Still filing today

37%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $273 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +448%
  • VC
    VASARI CARES FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $725 · revenue +23%
  • TB
    THE BARNES FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2023 · $589 · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF ABINGTON
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • WO
    WORD OF LIFE CALVARY CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • WW
    WILG WORKMANS INJURY LAW AND ADVOCACY GROUP
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
4
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
5
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
6
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
7
The Contemporary Jewish Museum

The contemporary jewish museum (the cjm) makes the diversity of the jewish experience relevant for a twenty-first-century audience through innovative exhibitions and programs that educate, challenge, and inspire.

Arts & Culture
8
Artis-Naples Inc

Please refer to schedule o for the organization's complete mission statement.

Arts & Culture
9
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
10
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc and the most unlike its peers is Open Arms Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Southwest Florida Community…Dog and Animal RescueFood Insecurity & Hunger Re…Pediatric Health SupportYouth Development ProgramsPerforming Arts Organizatio…Faith-Based Community Assis…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr15%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%75%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr15%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
14%
2,966/21,960

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREEN ST FRIENDS SCHOOL — $18,180 · OtherGREEN ST FRIENDS SCHOOLLUBAVITCH OF MONT COUNTY — $6,682 · OtherLUBAVITCH OF MONT COUNTYJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILA — $4,275 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILAJEWISH FEDERATION — $3,580 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONTEMPLE SHALOM INC — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF ABINGTON — $3,000 · OtherFOREVER MENTORED INC — $2,500 · Other+50 more — $20,840 · Other+50 moreMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $48,365 · Human ServicesMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATIONOPEN ARMS MINISTRY — $2,377 · Human Services+1 more — $750 · Human ServicesTHE BARNES FOUNDATION — $589 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC — $525 · Arts & CultureACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD — $500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC — $337 · Arts & CultureAMBLER THEATER INC — $100 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $75 · Arts & CultureLove to Langa — $1,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · InternationalVASARI CARES FOUNDATION — $725 · PhilanthropyADAGP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $600 · PhilanthropyNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $460 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $100 · EnvironmentCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $300 · HealthHIS BREAST CANCER AWARENESS INC — $150 · HealthABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100 · Health
Other$65,057Human Services$51,492Arts & Culture$2,126International$2,000Philanthropy$1,325Environment$560Health$550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $48,365 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC — $2,012 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHUYLKILL YMCA — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVASARI CARES FOUNDATION — $725 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetADAGP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION — $589 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Library of Collier County Inc — $540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHYY INC — $525 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD — $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLKSHULN OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC — $337 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC — $257 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ATLANTIC COUNTY INC — $215 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIS BREAST CANCER AWARENESS INC — $150 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMBLER THEATER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS MINISTRY
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC
  • Who funds Love to Langa
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SCHUYLKILL YMCA
  • Who funds VASARI CARES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ADAGP CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Friends of the Library of Collier County Inc
  • Who funds WHYY INC
  • Who funds ACT II PLAYHOUSE LTD
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
  • Who funds FOLKSHULN OF PHILADELPHIA INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aetna Foundation IncCT12.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aetna Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Levin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Jewish Family Services of Atlantic County Inc6% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph