Skip to content
Leprino Foods Company Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Leprino Foods Company Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$124k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MHuman Services$831kFood & Nutrition$690kYouth Development$507kRecreation & Sports$269kHealth$268kHousing & Shelter$207kReligion$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k44 grants · $852k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $504k
$16,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGS COUNTY LIBRARY$123,500
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$100,000
DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$100,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY$70,000
WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT$60,000
RENO AIR RACING ASSOCIATION INC DBA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP AIR RACES$50,000
ROOSEVELT ISD$45,000
JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC DBA THE ACTION CENTER$40,000
EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK$38,000
TRACY FFA FOUNDATION INC$35,000
TRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER$32,500
TRACY INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$32,500
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$30,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER GIRLS INC OF METRO DENVER$30,000
JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC DBA THE ACTION CENTER$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $626k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $38k → 17%American National Red Cross: $20k → 14%BRIGIT'S BOUNTY COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $5k → 9%REGIONAL HOME VISITATION PROGRAM: $8k → 13%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $8k → 12%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK: $24k → 17%Redistribution Center Inc: $16k → 7%MOUNTAIN STATES CHILDREN'S HOME: $11k → 9%SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER INC: $11k → 12%REGIONAL HOME VISITATION PROGRAM: $8k → 13%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $8k → 12%SENIORS RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 12%REGIONAL HOME VISITATION PROGRAM: $6k → 13%GIVE EVERY CHILD A CHANCE: $7k → 12%LOVE INC OF ALLENDALE: $10k → 8%FAMILY TREE INC: $12k → 7%SENIORS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10k → 12%CHAVES COUNTY CASA PROGRAM: $15k → 20%LOVE INC OF ALLENDALE: $10k → 8%FAMILY TREE INC: $11k → 7%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN AT COLORADO CHRISTIAN HOME: $10k → 12%FAMILY TREE INC: $10k → 7%SENIORS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $10k → 12%LOVE INC OF ALLENDALE: $10k → 8%REDISTRIBUTION CENTER INC: $8k → 7%KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC: $20k → 18%Chaves County Joy Center Inc: $10k → 20%LOVE INC OF ALLENDALE: $5k → 8%REDISTRIBUTION CENTER INC: $8k → 7%REDISTRIBUTION CENTER INC: $6k → 7%KARING 4 KIDS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY INC: $15k → 18%REGIONAL HOME VISITATION PROGRAM DBA BABY BEAR HUGS: $6k → 12%CHAVES COUNTY JOY CENTER INC: $10k → 20%TRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER: $33k → 12%CHAVES COUNTY CASA PROGRAM: $10k → 20%CHAVES COUNTY JOY CENTERS INC: $10k → 20%CHAVES COUNTY JOY CENTERS INC: $10k → 20%CHAVES COUNTY JOY CENTER INC: $10k → 20%MiCasa Resource Center: $15k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITIES SERVICES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $10k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITIES SERVICES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $10k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES AND COMMUNITIES SERVICES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $10k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT INC: $20k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT INC: $15k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT: $10k → 12%WISH FOR WHEELS: $20k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF COLORADO AND WYOMING: $10k → 12%SUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MN
MI
NY
NV
PA
CA
UT
CO
NM
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 77 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

77 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

77
132

Total granted

$3.8M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

79%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $795k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AE
    AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $729k · revenue ×20
  • DS
    DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $325k · revenue +161%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • HJ
    HANFORD JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $57k
  • CO
    CITY OF GREELEY MUSEUMS
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • PL
    POUDRE LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION I
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
2
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
3
Hunger Free Colorado

Hunger free colorado exists to end hunger in colorado.

Food & Nutrition
4
Metro Caring

Metro caring works with our community to meet people's immediate need for nutritious food while building a movement to address the root causes of hunger. (continued on sch o)metro caring, in partnership with our community, understands that…

—
5
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
6
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
7
Denver Area Youth Services

To promote and provide a continuum of human services to youth and their families.

Human Services
8
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
9
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
10
Feeding Colorado

The mission of feeding colorado, which represents the five feeding america food banks in the state, is to improve food security in colorado through policy, advocacy, partnership, and education.

Food & Nutrition
11
Colorado Child Advocacy Alliance

To support the missions of child advocacy centers in colorado to help children and their families heal from abuse and neglect via training, technical assistance, collaboration and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
12
Heart and Hand Center

Heart & hand center is dedicated to a world with no opportunity gap. by creating a nurturing community, heart & hand empowers all young people to realize their potential.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc; the most unlike its peers is Barryton Area Mobile Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
127/132
Grantees still filing
87/132
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KINGS COUNTY LIBRARY: $123,500 · Other+125 more: $2,787,296 · Other+125 moreAMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $728,618 · EducationAMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSIS…DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $325,000 · EducationDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDAT…COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $94,200 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY …HANFORD FOUNDATION FOR VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURE: $60,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $55,000 · Education+12 more: $171,735 · Education+12 moreTRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER INC: $64,500 · Human ServicesTRACY COMMUNI…A WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $62,500 · Human ServicesA WOMAN'S PLA…EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $62,000 · Human ServicesEARLY LEARNIN…CHAVES COUNTY JOY CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesCHAVES COUNTY…SO ALL MAY EAT INC: $45,400 · Human ServicesSO ALL MAY EA…REDISTRIBUTION CENTER INC: $41,418 · Human ServicesREDISTRIBUTIO…FAMILY TREE INC: $41,413 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE I…SENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC: $40,500 · Human ServicesSENIORS' RESO…LOVE INC OF ALLENDALE: $39,500 · Human ServicesLOVE INC OF A…CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 · Human ServicesKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $26,855 · Human ServicesCHAVES COUNTY CASA PROGRAM: $25,000 · Human Services+11 more: $136,300 · Human Services+11 moreGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $130,096 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRACY: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLORADO FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentREFUGE ARMONA: $43,000 · Youth DevelopmentMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FIRST TEE OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEVI LEGACY: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentChampions Recovery Alternative Programs Inc: $15,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentWELD FOOD BANK: $45,000 · Food & NutritionGODS BREAD BOX: $36,490 · Food & NutritionBig Green: $35,000 · Food & NutritionANGELS OF ACTION INC: $31,940 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $30,000 · Food & NutritionHAND2HAND: $30,000 · Food & NutritionBARRYTON AREA MOBILE FOOD PANTRY: $25,105 · Food & NutritionCHILD HUNGER OUTREACH PARTNERS: $24,000 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $20,000 · Food & NutritionKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNEW MEXICO FARM AND LIVESTOCK BUREAU FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $35,000 · HealthRobbies Hope Foundation: $35,000 · HealthSUNRISE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $22,500 · HealthBREAK THE SILENCE INC: $13,000 · HealthKINGS VIEW: $10,000 · HealthOur Heroes Dreams: $10,000 · HealthSOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $11,100 · HealthPOUDRE LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION I: $50,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $40,000 · Environment
Other$2,910,796Education$1,434,553Human Services$725,386Youth Development$408,096Food & Nutrition$287,535Health$191,600Environment$90,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $728,618 over 7y, 17% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $325,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $130,096 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $94,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF TRACY: $90,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetOne Morgan County: $74,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER: $70,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRACY INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $67,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER INC: $64,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $62,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $62,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHANFORD FOUNDATION FOR VOCATIONAL AGRICULTURE: $60,000 over 2y, 88% of budgetEASTERN NEW MEXICO STATE FAIR INC: $60,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $52,835 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHAVES COUNTY JOY CENTER: $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPOUDRE LEARNING CENTER FOUNDATION I: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHARVEST MINISTRIES OF ROSWELL: $47,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMID MICHIGAN HONOR FLIGHT INC: $46,539 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $45,400 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO FARM AND LIVESTOCK BUREAU FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWEST HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $45,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGE ARMONA: $43,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetTRACY CITY CENTER ASSOCIATION: $43,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetREDISTRIBUTION CENTER INC: $41,418 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $41,413 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC: $40,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE INC OF ALLENDALE: $39,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetFell in love farm: $38,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetNORTH SIDE HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATI: $37,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetGODS BREAD BOX: $36,490 over 6y, 27% of budgetGUADALUPE PARKWAY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC: $36,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBig Green: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRobbies Hope Foundation: $35,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetANGELS OF ACTION INC: $31,940 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKINGS COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSoroptimist International of Hanford: $30,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetHAND2HAND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRising Up: $29,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Denver FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Xcel Energy FoundationAnschutz Family Found…Rose Community Founda…El Pomar FoundationDaniels FundThe Janus Henderson F…Trailhead InstituteBoettcher FoundationCaring for Colorado F…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO41.9× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Janus Henderson Foundation · Trailhead Institute · Boettcher Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Leprino Foods Company Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Leprino Foods Company Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Leprino Foods Company Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Leprino Foods Company Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 240 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leprino Foods Company’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home