· Private foundation
Leonard Litz Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k37 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $529k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $683k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $170,000 |
| BRIDGEPORT PRIDE CENTER INC | $131,000 |
| TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER | $119,500 |
| CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| THE LOFT | $60,000 |
| GLAAD | $52,200 |
| CENTERLINK | $50,000 |
| THE PRIDE NETWORK | $39,000 |
| CONGREGATION BEIT SIMCHAT TORAH | $35,000 |
| NEW HAVEN PRIDE CENTER | $30,000 |
| ALI-FORNEY CENTER | $27,500 |
| ODYSSEY TEEN CAMP | $25,000 |
| HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| OUTRIGHT VERMONT | $25,000 |
| MILWAUKE LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $434k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
52 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $337k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $424k · revenue +16%
- PNPRIDE NETWORK INC4× · 2021–2024 · $119k · revenue +19% · 27% of their budget
- IOIN OUR OWN VOICES INC3× · 2021–2023 · $90k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- CECARRIBEAN EQUALITY PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +30%
- GMGAY MEN'S CHORUS OF WASHINGTON DCone grant, 2021 · $25k
- LOLIVE OUT LOUDone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a safe, supportive environment, the Hudson Valley LBGTQ Community Center provides services, professional resources, and programs that unite the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans-gender, and queer community across lines of age, race, gender,…
Pride Center of Vermont educates, advocates and celebrates with and for LGBTQ+ Vermonters.
The Alliance for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Youth provides mental health and care coordination services, leadership development, and policy advocacy that centers the lives and experiences of LGBTQ youth in…
Our mission is to ameliorate disparities faced by transgender, gender non-binary and intersex people as well as help reduce similar disparities among our lesbian, gay and bisexual communities.
To contribute to the visibility and inclusion of diverse sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, and sex characteristics (sogiesc) communities. to connect, grow, and support pride platforms and networks globally. to assist…
EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…
Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people
Colectivo Intercultural TRANSgrediendo is a social organization, which works on the empowerment of human rights, access and comprehensive health care of TransGNB people, strengthening the social and cultural expression of diverse gender…
To enhance and sustain the well-being of the lgbtqia+ and allied communities by providing programs and services that cultivate community; advocate for lgbtqia+ interests; educate and empower, and provide social support.
Public interest law firm
EqualityMaine works to protect and advance full equality for all lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Mainers by creating an inclusive and intersectional movement through political action, community building, education,…
Queer Asterisk empowers and nurtures the diverse ways of being that LGBTQ people embody by providing accessible counseling, education and community programs that uplift LGBTQ lives
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Gay and Lesbian Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harvard Gay & Lesbian Review Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTERLINK INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGEPORT PRIDE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PRIDE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY TEEN CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON BLADE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IN OUR OWN VOICES INC ↗
- Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERN PA TRANS EQUITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT VERMONT ↗
- Who funds BRADBURY-SULLIVAN LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKLAND COUNTY PRIDE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY PRIDE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OUT IN THE OPEN INC ↗
- Who funds Sam & Devorah Foundation For Trans Youth ↗
- Who funds YOUTH PRIDE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NORWALK CONSERVATORY OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CARRIBEAN EQUALITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARVARD GAY & LESBIAN REVIEW INC ↗
- Who funds PRIDE CENTER OF NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds EDGE NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centerlink Inc · Wild Geese Foundation Inc · Gill Foundation · David Bohnett Foundation · Tides Foundation · The World Health Clinicians Inc · Advancing Connecticut Together Inc · Health Care Advocates International Inc · The Astraea Foundation Inc · The Thomas Phillips and Jane Moore Johnson Foundation · Arcus Foundation · AIDS Healthcare Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leonard Litz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Roxbury Youthworks Inc — 88% of income from government
- The Pride Center of Maryland Inc — 49% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- South Coast Lgbtq Network Inc — 29% of income from government
- Out in the Open Inc — 25% of income from government
- Outright Vermont — 13% of income from government
- Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
- Mid Fairfield Aids Project — 10% of income from government
- Out Metrowest Inc — 9% of income from government
- Edge New Jersey Inc — 7% of income from government
- Triangle Community Center Inc — 5% of income from government
- Black Rock Theater Corporation — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leonard Litz Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Leonard Litz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.