Loading…
· Public charity
THE WORLD HEALTH CLINICIANS INC
Providing the highest quality of medical care to its patients in connecticut, specializing in primary care for people living with hiv, as well as hiv prevention (prep & pep), hepatitis c, and sti testing and treatment.
$487k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants
3
Communities
$221k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.
Recreation & Sports$1.2MCivil Rights$60kHuman Services$43kOther$601k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
educationlambda legal
2019
—
2020
—
2022
gay lesbiangendereducationtransgenderempowerslambda legaladvocacy
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $301k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
- TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER$220,600
- MID-FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT$80,000
- THE LOFT$33,428
- LAMBDA LEGAL$30,000
- HARTFORD GAY & LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE$20,000
- KIDS IN CRISIS$15,000
- THE PRIDE NETWORK INC$10,000
- NEW HAVEN PRIDE CENTER$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 3 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
3
Total granted
$1.8M
$37k
Still filing today
100%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Civil RightsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +72% · 45% of their budget
- MAMID-FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT7× · 2017–2024 · $529k · revenue +12%
- LLLAMBDA LEGAL3× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue +237%
Funded once
- LLLAMBDA LEGALone grant, 2019 · $20k
- NCNEWLANDS CLINICone grant, 2020 · $12k
- YLYOUNG LIVES FAIRFIELD COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Lgbt Life Center
Lgbt life center is a trusted leader that empowers the lgbtq communities and all people affected by hiv through improving health and wellness, strengthening families and communities, and providing transformative education and advocacy.
Health
2
The Gay & Lesbian Community Center
A) on april 13, 2024, the pride center at equality park hosted a day-long charrette with our distinctive stakeholders, donors, funders, elected officials, and community members. this charrette, vision 2035, updated the 2015 charrette which…
Human Services
3
Gay & Lesbian Community Services Center
Provided services to ensure the physical, psychological and social well being of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and hiv/aids affected community.
—
4
The Lgbtq Center of Durham Inc
To create a community where all LGBTQ+ lived experiences are affirmed, supported, and celebrated.
Human Services
5
The Gala Pride and Diversity Center
The gay and lesbian alliance of the central coast supports and empowers people of all sexual orientations, gender identities, and expressions to strengthen and unite our central coast community.
Unclassified
6
Transgender Law Center
Transgender Law Center TLC changes law, policy and attitudes so that all people can live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination regardless of their gender identity or expression.
Civil Rights
7
Sacramento Lgbt Community Center
The Center works to create a region where all LGBTQ+ people thrive; we support health and wellness,advocate for equity and justice, and work to uplift our diverse and culturally rich LGBTQ+ community.
—
8
Lgbt Center Intercultural Collective Inc
Colectivo Intercultural TRANSgrediendo is a social organization, which works on the empowerment of human rights, access and comprehensive health care of TransGNB people, strengthening the social and cultural expression of diverse gender…
Civil Rights
9
Lgbtq Center Lake County
The organization is dedicated to providing space, diverse programing, and cultural activities in an affirming, compassionate, and safe environment in the greater Lake County area.
Human Services
10
Gay Lesbian Bisexual & Transgend
To engage, empower, enrich, and advance the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender community of colorado.
—
11
Capital District Gay and Lesbian
To develop, support, and preserve the well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer community.
Civil Rights
12
Youth Pride Inc
Youth pride, inc.'s mission is to meet the unique, ongoing needs of lgbtq+ youth and young adults through direct services, support, advocacy, and education.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hartford Gay and Lesbian and the most unlike its peers is Pride Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Recreation & Sports$1,188,372Other$600,570Civil Rights$60,000Human Services$43,428
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE WORLD HEALTH CLINICIANS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Mid Fairfield Aids Project — 10% of income from government
- Triangle Community Center Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +72% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 223079559 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 45% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The World Health Clinicians Inc?
Find your warmest path to The World Health Clinicians Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines