· Public charity
The World Health Clinicians Inc
To prevent the spread of hiv/aids and sexually transmitted diseases, and to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality in the developed and developing worlds through treatment, education, patient advocacy and assistance.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $419,028 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $487,258 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $68,230 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $301k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER | $220,600 |
| MID-FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT | $80,000 |
| THE LOFT | $33,428 |
| LAMBDA LEGAL | $30,000 |
| HARTFORD GAY & LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE | $20,000 |
| KIDS IN CRISIS | $15,000 |
| THE PRIDE NETWORK INC | $10,000 |
| NEW HAVEN PRIDE CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $75k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: 2024 CHILDREN'S PROJECT & 2024 HIV EDUCATION
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +72% · 45% of their budget
- MFMID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT7× · 2017–2024 · $529k · revenue +12%
- LLLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC4× · 2018–2023 · $70k · revenue +187%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $12k
- YLYOUNG LIFE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a safe, supportive environment, the Hudson Valley LBGTQ Community Center provides services, professional resources, and programs that unite the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans-gender, and queer community across lines of age, race, gender,…
EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…
Pride Center of Vermont educates, advocates and celebrates with and for LGBTQ+ Vermonters.
Provided services to ensure the physical, psychological and social well being of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and hiv/aids affected community.
Provide hotline services to the gay & lesbian bisexual and transgendered community. services are completely free, and anonymous.
Public interest law firm
Legal advocates & defenders for the lgbtq and people with hiv communities - see sch o
Colectivo Intercultural TRANSgrediendo is a social organization, which works on the empowerment of human rights, access and comprehensive health care of TransGNB people, strengthening the social and cultural expression of diverse gender…
To create a community where all LGBTQ+ lived experiences are affirmed, supported, and celebrated.
To develop, support, and preserve the well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer community.
Hiv/aids counseling/assistance
Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Gay and Lesbian Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pride Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOFT- The Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PRIDE NETWORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Health Care Advocates International Inc · Leonard Litz Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The World Health Clinicians Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 31% of income from government
- Mid Fairfield Aids Project — 10% of income from government
- Triangle Community Center Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The World Health Clinicians Inc?
Find your warmest path to The World Health Clinicians Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.