Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Health Care Advocates International Inc

Health care advocates international is a health clinic facility with the aim of reducing the morbidity and mortality from hiv and sti's by fighting stigma & discrimination and ending homelessness via prevention programs, education, advocacy and treatment, with a focus on the lgbtq and hiv communities in the developed and developing…

$877k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192024.

Human Services$950kEnvironment$166kHealth$123kHousing & Shelter$35kCivil Rights$30kCommunity Improvement$20kReligion$20kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$10kOther$474k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $355,069 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $876,608 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $521,539 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$23,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HEALTH COLLECTIVE$50,000
LIBERATIONS PROGRAM INC$50,000
STOP AIDS$40,000
MID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT$40,000
TRANS HOUSING COALITION$35,000
SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR HIVAIDS (NOW PRISMA COMMUNITY CARE)$25,000
BALLROOM WE CARE$23,000
TONY'S PLACE$21,520
VISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER$15,199
STONEWALL YOUTH$15,000
MONTANO DE LUZ$10,350
TRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
ALEX INC$10,000
METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH OF HARTFORD$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $845k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Y2Y: $205k → 8%TONY'S PLACE: $22k → 16%STAND WITH TRANS: $11k → 8%TAKE: $30k → 16%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $110k → 12%SAMARITAN MINISTRY CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $8k → 12%OUTMEMPHIS: $20k → 17%INDIANA YOUTH GROUP: $43k → 16%STERLING HOUSE: $11k → 9%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $93k → 12%STERLING HOUSE: $5k → 9%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $85k → 12%YOUTH CONTINUUM: $75k → 12%NEW HAVEN PRIDE: $31k → 12%YOUTH CONTINUUM: $65k → 12%YOUTH CONTINUUM: $33k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
CT
CA
AZ
TN
NC
LA
AL
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $428k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$300k · 70% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONFERENCES

Sub-Saharan Africa$128k · 30% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ESSENTIAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$697k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$392k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+31%

Still filing today

78%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $305k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionCivil RightsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HUNT HILL FARM TRUST
    3× · 2021–2023 · $166k · revenue +268% · 74% of their budget
  • MF
    MID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT
    3× · 2019–2024 · $76k · revenue +12%
  • TO
    Time Out Youth Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TC
    TRANSCEND CHARLOTTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $170k · revenue -45%
  • II
    Identity Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $61k · revenue +31%
  • II
    IYG INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $43k · revenue +68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
2
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
3
The San Diego Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center

The san diego lgbt community center enhances and sustains the health & well-being of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, transgender, nonbinary, immigrant, and hiv communities to the betterment of our entire san diego region.

Health
4
The Attic Youth Center

The attic youth center creates opportunities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (lgbtq) youth to develop into healthy, independent, civic-minded adults within a safe and supportive community, and promotes the…

Youth Development
5
Legacy Community Health Services Inc

The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."

Health
6
Lgbt Center Intercultural Collective Inc

Colectivo Intercultural TRANSgrediendo is a social organization, which works on the empowerment of human rights, access and comprehensive health care of TransGNB people, strengthening the social and cultural expression of diverse gender…

Civil Rights
7
Speakout

The mission of Speak Out is to educate support and connect the LGBTQ community of color through social media engagement mentorship personal empowerment and health awareness.

Human Services
8
1N10 Inc

To provide support and resources for the local lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (lgbtq) youth. to provide youth with life and leadership skills and the tools to improve self esteem and acceptance of who they are.

Civil Rights
9
The Alliance for Lgbtq Youth Inc

The Alliance for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning Youth provides mental health and care coordination services, leadership development, and policy advocacy that centers the lives and experiences of LGBTQ youth in…

Human Services
10
Southern Tier Aids Program Inc

Stap compassionately and competently meets the evolving needs of its communities by serving people affected by chronic illness and to improve public health through disease prevention, care coordination, and advocacy.

11
True Colors Inc Sexual Minority Youth and Family Services of Ct

True colors mission is to improve the quality of life for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (lgbt) youth. we work to create a world where youth of all sexual orientations and gender identities are valued and affirmed. we challenge all…

12
Proud Haven Inc

Our mission is to provide a safe shelter and resources for LGBTQIA youth and young adults experiencing homelessness. We also provide resources and support to all members of the LGBTQIA population.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Haven Gay and Lesbian Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hunt Hill Farm Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySubstance Abuse TreatmentAt-Risk Youth MentoringHospice Care ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersLgbtq+ Community Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%11%<5yr12%11%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr20%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%25%<5yr12%8%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr14%14%35–55yr20%32%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 25% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/33
the rest of the field
10%
2,154/22,412

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
16/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUTH CONTINUUM INC — $377,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH CONTINUUM INCNEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $319,200 · Human ServicesNEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INCJim Collins Foundation Inc — $90,000 · Human ServicesJim Collins Foundation IncIYG INC — $42,500 · Human Services+7 more — $120,676 · Human Services+7 moreTRANSCEND CHARLOTTE INC — $170,305 · OtherTRANSCEND CHARLOTTE INCMID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT — $75,975 · OtherMID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECTIdentity Inc — $60,725 · OtherIdentity IncMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH OF HARTFORD — $51,542 · OtherMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY CHURCH O…HARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE INC — $50,000 · OtherHARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH…STOP AIDS — $40,000 · OtherSTOP AIDSTime Out Youth Inc — $20,000 · Other+5 more — $50,350 · Other+5 moreHUNT HILL FARM TRUST — $165,728 · EnvironmentHUNT HILL …LIBERATION PROGRAMS INC — $50,000 · HealthPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC) — $25,000 · HealthBALLROOM WE CARE INC — $23,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC — $15,199 · HealthTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline — $5,181 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $5,000 · HealthTRANS HOUSING COALITION INC — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterGLSEN INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsLOVE YOUR LABELS INC — $20,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$949,876Other$518,897Environment$165,728Health$123,380Housing & Shelter$35,000Civil Rights$30,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUTH CONTINUUM INC — $377,500 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetNEW HAVEN GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $319,200 over 4y, 17% of budgetHUNT HILL FARM TRUST — $165,728 over 3y, 74% of budgetJim Collins Foundation Inc — $90,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetMID FAIRFIELD AIDS PROJECT — $75,975 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetIdentity Inc — $60,725 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHARTFORD GAY AND LESBIAN HEALTH COLLECTIVE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLIBERATION PROGRAMS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIYG INC — $42,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTRANS HOUSING COALITION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetGLSEN INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC) — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTony's Place — $21,520 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetOUTMEMPHIS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOVE YOUR LABELS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetTime Out Youth Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSTERLING HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $16,156 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC — $15,199 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTONEWALL YOUTH — $15,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetYOUTH OASIS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetStand With Trans — $10,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMONTANA DE LUZ — $10,350 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTRIANGLE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAMARITAN MINISTRIES OF TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH INC — $7,500 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline — $5,181 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centerlink IncFL19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centerlink Inc · The World Health Clinicians Inc · Leonard Litz Foundation · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Yale University · Synchrony Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Health Care Advocates International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Youth Continuum Inc76% of income from government
  • Liberation Programs Inc24% of income from government
  • Mid Fairfield Aids Project10% of income from government
  • Hartford Gay and Lesbian Health Collective Inc9% of income from government
  • Sterling House Community Center Inc8% of income from government
  • Triangle Community Center Inc5% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Health Care Advocates International Inc?

Find your warmest path to Health Care Advocates International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph