· Private foundation
Leo Niessen Jr Charitable Tr-Main
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $110k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $198k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER | $25,000 |
| A MEANINGFUL PURPOSE | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $18,000 |
| HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM | $10,000 |
| FUND FOR GIRARD COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| DRUEDING CENTER | $10,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE DELAWARE VALLEY | $10,000 |
| GREATER PHILADELPHIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $10,000 |
| URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION | $10,000 |
| HOLY FAMILY UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FO | $10,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF PHILLY | $10,000 |
| WILLIAM H GRAY III MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PROJECT HOME | $10,000 |
| EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +254%
- AIACADEMY IN MANAYUNK5× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +79%
- TCTHE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +155%
Funded once
- CRCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +36%
WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORYone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +0%- JRJEWISH RUSSIAN CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
We develop, engage, and retain principals and system leaders who transform schools, dramatically improve student outcomes, and drive systemic change to prepare all philadelphia students for college, career, and life.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…
See schedule owe are an inclusive community on a mission to inspire unbounded curiosity and independent thought in every one of our students. in a unique educational environment that extends well beyond campus, we nurture students'…
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Graduate Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is American Bible Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOLY REDEEMER HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds IPRAXIS ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY IN MANAYUNK ↗
- Who funds THE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A MEANINGFUL PURPOSE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DRUEDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds LA SALLE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR GIRARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds HOLY FAMILY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds G FRED DIBONA JR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WISSAHICKON CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NUEVA ESPERANZA INC ↗
- Who funds The Devereux Foundation ↗
- Who funds SETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KIMMEL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MANOR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RUSSIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENCE HISTORICAL TRUST ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Wsfs Cares Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Skilling Joseph Kennard Td · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Business Leadership Organized for Catholic Schools · The Maguire Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leo Niessen Jr Charitable Tr-Main funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Nueva Esperanza Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.