· Private foundation
Leo Daniel Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $458k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MARY FOUNDATION | $120,000 |
| ST PETER CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| FULLNESS OF TRUTH CATHOLIC MINISTRIES | $96,279 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO | $91,410 |
| THE ALEXANDER HOUSE | $50,000 |
| BAYLOR UNIVERSITY | $40,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $24,250 |
| ALLIED WOMENS CENTER | $22,448 |
| ST STANISLAUS CHURCH | $18,450 |
| AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| YOUNG AMERICA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
| SISTERS OF ST BENEDICT | $10,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWellmed Charitable Foundation5× · 2019–2023 · $412k · revenue +31%
- TMTHE MARY FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $311k · revenue +171%
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY6× · 2019–2024 · $230k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- MAMexican American Catholic College Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $110k · revenue +84%
- AWALLIED WOMENS CENTER OF SAN ANTONIOone grant, 2022 · $61k · revenue -18%
- TPTHE PREGNANCY RSOURCE CENTERone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
Brite divinity school educates and inspires people to serve god's diverse world as leaders in churches, the academy, and public life.
Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…
Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…
The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…
Baylor college of medicine (bcm) is committed to advancing human health through the integration of patient care, research, education, and community services.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…
University education grounded in the traditions and faith of the roman catholic church
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Turtle Creek Volunteer Fire. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Wellmed Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE MARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Mexican American Catholic College Inc ↗
- Who funds FULLNESS OF TRUTH ↗
- Who funds ALLIED WOMENS CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds THE FOURTH MAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA PROMESA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Witte Museum ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scanlan Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Arnold & Irene Kocurek Fdn 1986 Tr · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leo Daniel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.